Unique 32 Number Betting System

[Reyth]

1) Bet 1 unit on Red
2) Bet 2 units on the 1st and 2nd column

Total Bet: 5 units

3) Note your balance and spin 20 times
4) If positive balance start over otherwise bet until you lose
5) Double your bets; repeat until you win
6) If chips are in a single doubled (one time) status OR if in overall profit, execute step #8
7) Lower chips one level & re-spin; if a win repeat #6 otherwise execute step #5
8] If in overall profit start over, otherwise execute step #7

The creator says that 100 units will do the job.

This system seems to have an amazing ability to fight variance without risking large portions of the bankroll and produce very strong profit when variance has been going our way.

[Dane]

How many  Creators  have stated
that a certain number of units will do?
System sellers often say something like that.
Sooner or later we might discover that we have been fooled.

A Red Martingale blew double trouble bubbles.
Adding columns to betting might not save us.

[Reyth]

This plays different to me than a standard Martingale.  I haven't studied the worst the wheel is expected to bring to determine how many units are required but so far 100 units has held.

[Jesper]

That is a hedging bet on red. Trying to reduce the loss if the 3rd column hits. We lose all on four numbers and 3 on all the reds in that column. On the other hand we win less than a black number hits in the two first columns.

I do not think we can use the carpet layout making it better than betting two columns.

Hedging use to not be a good practice on a wheel with unfair odds.

[Sputnik]

 The hedge bet is perfect.
 I save this among my material and will experiment with sleepers and progression where the hedge bet will have a important overall funktion.

Cheers

[Reyth]

Cool guys!  Keep me updated and I will update on my progress here too!

Here is the payout:

+1:4,10,13,22,28,31,2,8,11,17,20,26,29,35 (14)
+3:1,7,16,19,25,34,5,14,23,32 (10)
-3:3,9,12,18,21,27,30,36 [8]
-5:0,6,15,24,33 (5)

This is somewhat similar to playing 2 dozen which means the worst expected successive draw-down will be 16 losses in a row:

5,10,20,40,80,160,320,640,1280,2560,5120,10240,20480,40960,81920,163840




I think looking at this loss distribution, 2 or 3 losses in a row would be a good trigger but it seems like the winning range is a problem because the payout is too weak to cover the draw-down in a single bet...?