Some unique concepts about this system:

1) Raise strongly when you win except when halfway to your target goal and start betting less and less

2) Bet less when you lose except when "halfway" (really situation dependent) to your target goal and starting betting the same OR more and more

3) It doesn't focus on your current balance but instead the chances to win after a set number of bets

One of the secrets about this formula is that it is always tracking the percentage chances of getting a hit automatically; the bet amounts always take this into account. So its simultaneously tracking the dominant EC AND the statistics.

This method allows for far less money to be risked than a normal up as you lose progression. If I just had the formula I know I could make this win not just for EC's but any bet selection.

One of the main reasons that I am so confident is, what if when betting an EC you always had a second chance on a losing bet so that in order to lose you would need 2 in a row to beat you? It would make it harder to lose, right?

Another main reason is the fact that I can make the calculations extend much longer than 10 spins and always keep the "risk less to gain more" advantage.

All I need is the ratios calculation formula and there are people on the interwebs that know this formula and are using it; most of them are Italian and using it for sports betting but not all of them because there are people using it for roulette...

Here is an example of someone that knows the formula and is using this for roulette:

The formula uses 3 data points:

1) Total bankroll risked (here its 100 units)

2) Percentage chance of a win (here its .4865)

3) Total number of betting events (here its 10)

Talos' system is something like 275 or 300 betting events (not ever reached) and risking something like 1400 units, where he quits at +1 or better. If I had the formula, I could just punch those figures in and duplicate his system results.

That is not my actual goal but is certainly something I would try to see what happens.