Author Topic: Open Source " Cardboard Computer"  (Read 517 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Fyodor

  • Mature Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 159
  • Thanked: 168 times
Open Source " Cardboard Computer"
« on: December 18, 2017, 03:47:16 AM »
Am working on a new approach to the game.
Computers work because of programs and algorithms, well, I applied a formula to the roulette sequence, and discovered interesting parallels with the Chines Perpetual Calender, a unique device that allows alignments showing days, months and covering fifty years.
That's 18,250 days/438,000 hours!
Roulette has 37 pockets, distributed over three dozens, etc...
So, I accounted for as many possibilities as required and applied an immutable formula that could be read straight off the chart.
No electronics, no cameras, no "cheating", just a neat and effective reference formula that provides a "Hot" target as required.
Should allow a defined "forecast" of future results, so will test it against a universally accepted source, such as Bad Homburg or Wiesbaden, then they can be independently verified. - Forecasts/results will be posted, or, in this case, Forecast/Targets will be posted FIRST. Actual result comparisons, will be posted by the signified/chosen Casino.
 
The following users thanked this post: kav, Reyth, MickyP

Reyth

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4393
  • Thanked: 1615 times
Re: Open Source " Cardboard Computer"
« Reply #1 on: December 18, 2017, 03:52:17 AM »
Sound kewl!
 

kav

  • www.Roulette30.com
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2240
  • Thanked: 1178 times
  • Gender: Male
Re: Open Source " Cardboard Computer"
« Reply #2 on: December 18, 2017, 05:13:58 AM »
How is a "hot target" defined?
 

MickyP

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1326
  • Thanked: 564 times
  • Gender: Male
Re: Open Source " Cardboard Computer"
« Reply #3 on: February 03, 2018, 02:37:09 PM »
Fyodor, I love the concept. I wait in anticipation for you to reveal some test results.

Old methods of doing things are often smothered by our reliance on technology.
 
The following users thanked this post: Reyth