Bayes, thank you for your inquiry.
As I wrote in my earlier posts about my platforms, they have been developed through many years of R&D with feedback data from solely land based and online Casinos.
They can be divided in three categories:
1/ Platforms based of Frequency distance Differentiation and Harmonics (they were the most complex to build but possess extreme sector accuracy as verified by my VRTech Team of testpilots using them against the best Online Casinos in Europe). The algorithms calculating the most probable sector, are divided in sub algos and main algos, and count in the tens of thousands working collectively in producing the next most probable sector in the upcoming spin. (which demands a good processor in ones computer)
2/ Platforms based on Wheel distance differentiation. Based on the interrelated distance between the 8-10 (depending on platform) latest spun numbers, where both directions are calculated. As every upcoming number contains within it the BIAS of the wheel this application is even more precise than ordinary VB where you only have your eye and your brains ability to predict the most probable sector on the wheel. Some even use tiny computers (like Thorpe in US during the 50s or today´s used by many techies from especially former Eastern Europe). But if they get caught they are barred from every casino in Europe due to their new highly efficient database. My platforms based on WDD produce no such problems as the calculation and bet selection is finished in a second after the last spin is fed to the platform and the Casino has no chance of suspecting assisting software behind my bets.
3/ The simplest platforms I develop are the Wheel Mappers/Plotters. As you have seen in my latest post. There are no sophisticated algorithms ion them except a few necessary excel formulas to enable plotting according to the wheel distribution with each spin. The rest is up to ones own intuition combined with some insight into correlated number distributions in physical number generators like the roulette wheel.
All my platforms have inbuilt money management, stop loss warning lamps, Charted variance curve information on your made bet selection against the house and so on which secures a positive outcome with profits from everything from at worst -10 to -30 units (very rare) to up to +600 units, with an average income of around +200 to 300 units.
The necessary amount of spins are usually around 60 -70 spins. Max dip loss during a session is at an average -26 units.
Now to show you that even the simplest platforms like the VR Wheel Plotter can be efficient during a session, lets see the following example from a recent session (the platform is in post analysis mode and I have removed the money management section for the sake of pointing out the bet selection strategy)
Here we see the Wheel plotter with both CW spins (yellow columns) and CCW spins (green columns) plotted with the ten latest spins:
As you see it might be a bit difficult to determine the next most probable sector for the green CCW spin (which the analysis column to the furthest left show to be 33). Hence we let all CW (yellow) plots go invisible by turning a switch to setting 1. Then this is what we see.
So what do you see? Hard to determine? Well, a trained eye like mine sees the following in a couple of seconds and then quickly makes a bet selection which is put on the Roulette Race Track (+table).
As you see the predicted ball intercepting sector is basically coming up the next 2 CCW spins (33 and 10).I hope this long post answers some of your questions. As you understand I cant be too specific on certain details as my platforms are reserved only for myself and my Team that have received them free of cost against the only demand of producing a test session against the best online casinos and report back to the team with a strict protocol (which they gladly do since some of them make a lot of money). Up till this date none of my platforms have ever busted the entire Bankroll, not even 15% of it. The most common size of the bankroll is 300-400 units( depends on platform) and a stop loss of half that size (though not even such an event has ever happened in all our thousands of tests for over a year now).