Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10
21
Casino Lounge / Re: THE SHOWDOWN THREAD.
« Last post by mr j on Yesterday at 02:16:15 PM »
Listen up Menstrual Bleeder......pull that damn string out and go to a CASINO and EARN, like a man does. Dont sit around naked in your moms basement, eating Corn Flakes and drinking Pepsi all day (lol).

Put your big boy pants on and become a man. Less posting (out of boredom) and more DOING!!

You need psychiatric care Menstrual Bleeder. Does your insurance cover it? If not, drop me a line and I'll float you some cash. This board is your life because......its ALL YOU HAVE. A couple buddies here and starting threads regarding what you WOULD DO if you were a man at a CASINO. Your total BR wouldn't even cover my dinner. HaHaHaHa

Losers lose pal, sorry.  ;)

Ken
22
@thelaw,

Honestly, I was surprised when Trump proposed raising age limits to buying rifles...and he also seemed to support banning bump stocks and universal background checks.  This is great!  And this is the kind of common sense reform most people support.  The only problem is that within a couple days he seemed to backtrack on his own words...which seems like he was buckling because it would hurt him politically. 

Saying a truck can kill alot of people to make a point against common sense gun regulation is a false argument.  It's like saying sugar is harmful to your health and it's legal, so we shouldn't make heroin illegal. 

Trump is not a genius at business.  You will never see his business practices taught in an economics book.  Trumps wealth mainly comes from branding himself.  Because of his name, he gets opportunities to make him money.  I have no problem how people earn their money.  Kim Kardashian wealth comes from name branding too.  But I wouldn't want to see her as president either. 

I do get why people voted for him though.  He's not a career politician.  People are fed up with politicians not doing their job, and only working for the special interest groups and corporations.  I had hope for Trump, but hes let me down.  Just a couple years ago he was saying the US should have universal healthcare provided by the government.  Seems like he's fell back in party lines with what he believes.

Btw, I would not have voted for Hillary either.  Bill was awesome, and could work well with Republicans to get things done.  I don't see Hillary as being the same as her husband.  I think Obama was a smart guy who did a great job bringing us back from the great recession.  But I'm disappointed that he didn't do more with ending our wars in the mideast.  Hope that Trump has some success with the meeting with North Korea.  I believe that diplomacy should always be exhausted before we decide to start dropping bombs.
23
Questions and Answers / Re: Roulette syllabus
« Last post by kav on Yesterday at 01:43:40 PM »
Obvious scam. Buyer beware and avoid!
24
Roulette Systems / Re: system of the mirror
« Last post by MrPerfect. on Yesterday at 01:35:28 PM »
Rimski? Have you ever had an idea to shoot yourself in the leg or pin down palm of your hand to the table?
   I'm serious.  Result of progression in negative expectation game is just that. Shooting yourself in the leg. It's your leg and your choice..  l do not wanna influence it in any way, my goal is just to make you aware of consequences. 
   This game is not about masochism. .. let it to others, there are lots of them already ,enough on this and any other forum. You got a choice... be one of them " own leg shooters brotherhood" or be someone different...  if your choice in this matter is logical and reasonable,  you know how to find me, right?
25
Roulette Systems / Re: system of the mirror
« Last post by rimsky on Yesterday at 01:21:06 PM »
Using the progression you win 0.5 on the first winning bet and 1 on the second and third. Thus 0.8 is a medium value for the three
26
Questions and Answers / Re: Roulette syllabus
« Last post by Mike on Yesterday at 12:54:44 PM »
"APPROVED MATHEMATICALLY IMPOSSIBLE TO LOSE"

Quote
It is a scam, isnt it?

I think that's a fair assessment, lol.
27
Roulette Systems / Re: system of the mirror
« Last post by Mike on Yesterday at 12:46:33 PM »
It doesn't matter what side you're betting on, but the chance of a loss is 19/37 and the chance of win is 18/37. In your post you referred to LOSING all 3 bets, so you should have used 19/37. Obviously this is higher than the chance of winning because of the zero.

And I don't understand what you've done here

Quote
So about 9 times over 10 we gain a profit, and about 1 time over ten we loose 5 chips

Therefore we should have (0,8 * 9) - (5 *1) = + 2,2 profit

where does the 0.8 come from?
28
Roulette Systems / Re: system of the mirror
« Last post by rimsky on Yesterday at 12:18:26 PM »
Excuse me Mike,

but I was referring to the chance that a EC with 18/37 probability comes out three times in a row.
And the probability is (18/37) * (18/37) * (18/37) = 0,11.

Thus the probability that for example RED comes out three in a row is 11%.
We have 11% to meet this event and then loose if we were betting againt it.

Am I wrong?
29
Questions and Answers / Re: Roulette syllabus
« Last post by GIAJJENNO on Yesterday at 12:12:29 PM »
It is a scam, isnt it?
30
Roulette Systems / Re: system of the mirror
« Last post by Mike on Yesterday at 12:08:49 PM »
There is a (18/37) * (18/37) * (18/37) = 0,11 = 11% chance to loose the next three bet in a row

rimsky,

I have to correct you here. The chance of a loss is 19/37, not 18/37, so the chance of losing all 3 bets is (19/37)^3 = 13.54%. I'm afraid it means that the result is negative (as it must be) when you use this correct value in your calculations.
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10