Mr Green casino

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10
21
Casino Lounge / Re: New wheels
« Last post by GIAJJENNO on Yesterday at 11:07:49 PM »
Great! Try Palestis and Harrys single dozen system.
22
Casino Lounge / New wheels
« Last post by heatmap on Yesterday at 10:59:44 PM »
My casino just got waht seems to be around 8 new wheels. No more TCS John Huxley. All new wheels are CAMMEGH. They have no VISIBLE security features except what seems to be an ACCULEVEL. All wheels at my casino have something underneath and im almost sure its ACCULEVEL. this helps fix drop zone bias by LEVELING and ROTATING the wheel without having to pick up the wheel. A whole new world has just opened up for me. I can already tell these machines are paying out way more than their counterparts. TCS John Huxelys seem unbeatable to me. Although i havent watched the tables that much, it seemed as if there were LESS people losing. I also tried one spin and won (bought in 10 dollars and hit a repeater #9 which was the previous win for someone else then left + 25) but i dont have a system any more its just gambling to me.
23
Questions and Answers / Have you ever bet the opposite numbers on purpose?
« Last post by heatmap on Yesterday at 10:51:46 PM »
Sometimes I say im going to cover one half of the wheel, say by combining the FIRST and THIRD columns. Well instead of doing that I do the opposite and will cover the other half just because?
24
im absolutely certain rrs but you are correct, its worlds more difficult but i didnt even begine doing this because of rrs, it started when i noticed that my predictions were a bit off when the dealer would actually push and speed the wheel up. so i would adjust above and below my predictions. if the wheel was sped up, i would play in front of my intended target, and if it slowed (which i couldnt visably see which rrs is meant not to be seen) i would play in the back of my target. OR Vice versa. When the wheel wasnt adjusted, i was a bit more lucky, but if you have ever read the way i think wheels are "randomized" everything i just said doesnt matter. You can predict a small section where the ball might land and even maybe a pocket where the ball will land but I dont believe RRS is the ONLY security feature at play.
25
@heatmap,  if you suspect rrs, it changes the game a bit. Unless ball stops where it drops, such wheels require very twisted logic to be assessed.
     For example,  very often distance prediction don't make any sense at all on such wheels.
26
Roulette Systems / Re: Mickys Pattern Revamp Method.
« Last post by Optimistique on Yesterday at 07:51:56 PM »
How do you get a simulator to decide what 4 splits to play? It constantly changes as you read the game. Although there are mechanical parts to the method the human element can not be programed. The decision on what splits to play does not depend on one factor only. There are many factors involved in the decision.

I guess you misunderstood me. Thanks GIAJJENNO.

I couldnt put the link on here. Google the famous Roulette Similator. I guess you know that site.

Thanks.
27
@mrperfect i also factor in the wheel speeding up or slowing down and i predict accordingly. If the ball is spun in a certain direction, and the wheel slows down or speeds up it can either be above or below prediciton. AND YES THE WHEELS DO SPEED UP ITS A FORM OF RRS if anyone is curious.
28
Roulette Systems / Re: Mickys Pattern Revamp Method.
« Last post by GIAJJENNO on Yesterday at 06:56:27 PM »
How do you get a simulator to decide what 4 splits to play? It constantly changes as you read the game. Although there are mechanical parts to the method the human element can not be programed. The decision on what splits to play does not depend on one factor only. There are many factors involved in the decision.

Micky,

I think he thought not to code simultanously the method, so not to be programmed, but an online play on site roulette simulator. This is a page just, where you can show, how you play the game, than can link here the session.
29
Roulette Systems / Re: Mickys Pattern Revamp Method.
« Last post by MickyP on Yesterday at 06:41:51 PM »
How do you get a simulator to decide what 4 splits to play? It constantly changes as you read the game. Although there are mechanical parts to the method the human element can not be programed. The decision on what splits to play does not depend on one factor only. There are many factors involved in the decision.
30
Roulette Systems / Re: NEW SYSTEM: SINGLE DOZEN
« Last post by GIAJJENNO on Yesterday at 04:30:29 PM »
Thanks for the answer. Near me did not exist B and M casino, only airball roulette. We sit down on the seat, and the machine starts spin the ball on wheel in the middle, and we place bets on screens. It is not allowed to stand up, only if I cash out, but it is unneccessary, cause we dont have another table, just in other casino.

I just asked for you, how would you play your game with 200 unit bankroll, and what would be your staking plan.

I prefer rather 2-2-3, than 1-1-1,5 or 1-1-2. So would you play, or you recommend that after 2 consecutive loss raise bets to 5-5-10, until to recover losses? I also dont like to stick to progression. But I think about, that not only after 2 losses rise bets, but xample in 3 losses in 5 triggers, or 4 lost in 7 triggers, etc. when I see, that the WR started to be low. Than rise to 5-5-10, and play until recover, and the WR change to good. What do you think?

When only one table is possible, with 200 unit bankroll, would you also use virtual losses in this case?
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10