Recent Posts

21

Casino Lounge / Re: Prediction methods.

« Last post by MickyP on Yesterday at 06:15:27 PM »

I must have read 800 times, wait until a VIRTUAL loss, then start betting. I was the only one who read that?
That would be called a trigger.

Two things Ken.
1. We have established you can read.
2. We have established that you don't understand what you read.

To bet after a virtual win/loss requires the formation of a new trigger before bets are placed.
If you are using triggers bets are placed after the formation of the trigger.

22

Casino Lounge / Re: Prediction methods.

« Last post by MickyP on Yesterday at 06:09:31 PM »

MrPerfect, as usual,  a good reply.
I started the thread more for discussion sake than anything else. Prediction is an aspect of the game that is used selectively. Hanging in the background when playing to expectation is gamblers fallacy...

23

Roulette system coding / Re: Cluster method.

« Last post by jerome26b on Yesterday at 05:58:09 PM »

ok thanks and if there’s no 3 times repeater you switch to other session ? After 20 spins no hit you consider it a losing session so ? and if splits hits but not main in the 20 spins you switch as well or stop ?

jerome

24

Roulette system coding / Re: Cluster method.

« Last post by drenek on Yesterday at 04:39:19 PM »

Hello,

I am Drenek Rinaldo's friend. Forgive my English I use the translator.

The results in the file are based on the following parameters:

Observation: last 15 spins
number selection: number taken out 3 times. (hot number)
Duration of the attack : 20 spins

25

Casino Lounge / Re: Prediction methods.

« Last post by MrPerfect. on Yesterday at 04:17:27 PM »

Mickey.... to escape sequences from hell is why we bother to predict in the first place. When it's really sucks, most of the time is a player fault.
   Let's say, player choose some target... zone or numbers, pick on graph..  doesn't matter. And then they changed the ball or start to serve whatever type of throw ( very strong back spin, for example), or it started rain outside. ....
    If player do not recognise change of situition,  he will be jelous of system players with their losses around HE...
   Speaking openly, prediction is nessesary evil. Although not always helpfull,  it provides some reference . Job of player in this case is just to look if situation in general is corresponding to his play model or not. What matters is a model, not prediction itself.

26

Casino Lounge / Re: Prediction methods.

« Last post by mr j on Yesterday at 02:36:30 PM »

I must have read 800 times, wait until a VIRTUAL loss, then start betting. I was the only one who read that?
That would be called a trigger.

27

Casino Lounge / Re: The Talos debate

« Last post by leowls on Yesterday at 01:54:24 PM »

The rest wiesbaden on RX :
187 spins
+57 units

221 spins
+101 units

305 spins
+85 units

492 spins
+142 unit

Hi mind sharing your method?

28

Roulette system coding / Re: Cluster method.

« Last post by jerome26b on Yesterday at 11:58:39 AM »

Hi Rinad,

great results by the way. I tried your method and had good results at the beginning before a big down and i dropped it but maybe can win in the long term like your stats show it. Do you have more details about yours sessions ? Still playing hot numbers and drop it if didn’t show after x spins ? Having the good ratio with staying in same selection and switching can be the key i think. Switching too early is not good and too late too. You do it after 20 spins ?

kind regards.

Jerome

29

Casino Lounge / Re: Prediction methods.

« Last post by MickyP on Yesterday at 09:15:16 AM »

A virtual win  / virtual loss is not a trigger. It is the result of a trigger that has been played in the mind and not with chips on the felt. Some players resort to virtual betting to "allow for the bumps in a sequence of numbers" to subside.
Triggers do not work 100% of the time but the high % of hits within a few spins confirms the value of the tool.

30

Gambling Philosophy / Re: Wise quotes

« Last post by mr j on Yesterday at 09:03:28 AM »

“We can not solve our problems with the same level of thinking that created them”