What we do when testing a method, is to see if we can using betting strategies overcome the expected value and the variance on the negative side. In a run of many thousend spins it will never since roulette was invented the very same stream show up twice, the combinations are so large it is hard to grasp, much more than all the stars if not atoms in the universe.. If we move just one number to an other place and then test again, the result can be very different.
That is the main reason I no days not run simulations. I know there are better or less better methods, but at the end it is the numbers we face during playing. The only numbers which are of importance are the numbers we bet.
With system and other means we try to overcome the negative odds and the variance against us, and I think we can do it to a certain grade, in short time even very well.
Since there are on line casinos which offer fair odds, the problem which math-people repeat as the reason we can not win, it is to try to balance the variance.
I have seen one 1000 times a sleeping number, but which must be so rare I will never see it ever again, I think it must be over 5 SD. Today it was three 4:s in a row and a double after three spins. What happens, and we see it if we see
enough spins, and I may have played over a million, as it can be 1000 some days, it will takes some years but it is time, so I think I have done it. Knowing it has never been 1000 series which are exactly the same. The Chessboard problem deals with 64 times, and that is EC:s not numbers.
I think there are some limits which never will be passed unless we are extremely unlucky. Take a 1000 sleeper in accountt is like have a Lightning rod in the cap, probably not needed a sunny day.
If I should try a longer run in play using pennies, it should be the only valid way to do a test, as we never
meet the same twice.
Numbers will hit in clusters, they never (almost never) shows up at the expected value, there will be 37 spins with 0 to 5 of a kind. If 5 shows up I mean it can do it next time as well, but not forever.
It may be a session lasting some days or it may be a week or even more, the limit is the bankroll.
The plan is to use the same number all the time, which may be bad for a shorter test, but should not matter at all in a longer(if the outcome has no bias).
I have tried this before, did not lose anything, but the winnings were very small, like an Euro a 1000 spins.
This time try it again and use a negative progression, which not count for more than 600 miss in a row, and
then count with a period better.
The autospin will be set to 37, as it is too boring waiting and attend it, and start it when I have time. My plan is to try to survive 100000 spins.
ZERO as number all the time and run it for 37 spins, not stop on a hit, run it to end. I have put 300 Euro in the bank, which may not be enough, I will take decision of more if the question arise(probably).
I will report back after 10000 spins or a failure.