Click Here to Visit Las Vegas USA Casino!

Author Topic: Faith in roulette simulators  (Read 758 times)

chip

  • New
  • **
  • Posts: 5
Faith in roulette simulators
« on: April 27, 2016, 04:14:29 PM »
Like religions I've tried several simulators.  Even ones that have been recommended on this forum as being "nice" like "loothog.com".  The fact is that when thoroughly examined they prove corrupt. Like seriously! Even sometimes forgetting to add payouts.  *Is there any collaborative site which examines the programming code for a working towards perfection of a roulette simulator? I know that this is a big task because there is no such this as computer driven random, but I'd like one that at least has the game fundamentals functioning accurately and has a #/bet/bank log to follow for review and the programming code for the simulator.  Has this "wheel" as described already been built on the internet somewhere? Pun intended.
« Last Edit: April 29, 2016, 07:53:03 PM by kav »


 

chip

  • New
  • **
  • Posts: 5
Faith in roulette simulators
« Reply #1 on: April 27, 2016, 04:37:31 PM »
Could people please respond with a there favorite three simulators, and maybe we could examine the top three that are listed in another post.
« Last Edit: April 27, 2016, 08:16:08 PM by kav »
 

UK-21

  • New
  • **
  • Posts: 115
  • Thanked: 39 times
  • Gender: Male
Faith in roulette simulators
« Reply #2 on: April 27, 2016, 06:42:41 PM »
Visit my site and take a look at one I programmed in Excel. No funny business there, only random (as far as Excel's RNG is random) numbers, although the bet/payout routine has to be specifically coded for whatever it is you're trying to do. All of the code is viewable.

If you're already comfortable programming with VBA then everything there should be pretty clear. If not, but you're up for learning, I've put in a system that simply bets on a split number on every occasion - as an example of how to code the bets, and then the payoffs if a winning number results.

I learned to code doing something similar.

(www).uk-21.org/downloads.shtml
« Last Edit: April 27, 2016, 08:16:19 PM by kav »
 
The following users thanked this post: december, Reyth

Trilobite

  • Veteran Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 300
  • Thanked: 98 times
Re: Faith in roulette simulators
« Reply #3 on: April 29, 2016, 10:22:50 AM »
Excel's rng is crap

You're way better off importing integers from random.org

But I'm not sure I even completely trust them any more. Better than excel though
 

Reyth

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3318
  • Thanked: 979 times
Re: Faith in roulette simulators
« Reply #4 on: April 29, 2016, 11:53:32 AM »
You're way better off importing integers from random.org

But I'm not sure I even completely trust them any more.

« Last Edit: April 29, 2016, 11:56:34 AM by Reyth »
 

UK-21

  • New
  • **
  • Posts: 115
  • Thanked: 39 times
  • Gender: Male
Re: Faith in roulette simulators
« Reply #5 on: April 29, 2016, 05:32:19 PM »
Excel's rng is crap

Well . . . I know it comes with a public health warning around using it for security or encryption purposes, but I've never known it to produce results that fall outside of statistical norms. For testing a roulette "system", I think it's random enough.
 

Reyth

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3318
  • Thanked: 979 times
Re: Faith in roulette simulators
« Reply #6 on: April 29, 2016, 05:42:03 PM »
What someone needs to do is test an EC for the maximum consecutive loss.  It needs to show something around 25.  If it shows anything higher than 25 I would be incredibly impressed.