I played around with the dot system ( I just give it a name) and counted on your sheet around 30 bets before taking action.
Is 30 spins the about number when 3 rows are significant more hit than the rest of the rows?
I think what casino's hate is people having patience overall. You can beat a lot having patience in life in general, cause most people are lived by the circumstances. In that matter everybody understand that casino's manipulate in order you convince you it is time to bet a bit earlier than you meant to do.
Thanks for your answer.
YES THAT SOUNDS JUST ABOUT RIGHT.
I TOO, HAVE FOUND THAT 25-30 SPINS ARE REQUIRED ON THE AVERAGE TO SHOW 3 LINES (rows) GET AHEAD FROM THE OTHERS. IF A ROULETTE IS STATISTICALLY BALANCED FOR 30 SPINS, YOU CAN OBSERVE ANOTHER ROULETTE OR MORE AT THE SAME TIME UNTIL YOU SEE THIS CONDITION IN ONE ROULETTE. IT'S NOT THAT HARD TO RUN INTO THIS CONDITION. And that proves my point that I always try to make. Observing many many numbers spun out of many roulettes, helps you come up with YOUR OWN PROBABILITIES, the ones that are PRACTICAL TO USE, as opposed to applying standard probabilities out of the textbook. In this case the 25-30 spins required to show a preference in 3 rows of numbers.
Yes the casinos hate patience. No wonder they let the ALCOHOL DRINKS, flow freely and push them to the players. Do they give them to us FOR FREE because they are our friends? LOL.
The question is how to play this system in a way that A PLAYER HAS THE ADVANTAGE. The logic is that a crystal clear TREND (in this case 3 rows), can not suddenly disappear out of the sky, as if someone flipped a switch. It could, but it is much more rare to disappear, than to continue for at least ONE MORE TIME. THAT ONE MORE TIME is all you need to make the damage. Then to be certain you start the system all over again. And for added security you don't use unlimited progressions, until you hit it. You limit your progressions to maybe up to 7 times, and then abandon it. ( progression in 3 rows bet is not that expensive, as it is with BLACK and RED). You'll catch it in the next cycle.
IS IT POSSIBLE THAT A CLEAR TREND DISAPPEARS EVERY TIME YOU TRY TO FOLLOW IT, CYCLE AFTER CYCLE AFTER CYCLE? It sounds
IMPOSSIBLE TO ME , and extensive testing has proven to be IMPOSSIBLE. And by limiting your progressions for a FIXED AFFORDABLE numbers of times, avoids a big disaster, when you run into a rare exception. (which by the way sooner or later it will happen when you play a system all the time). For example by playing BLACK or RED and doubling each time you win $5. (If you play 5, 10, 20 ,40 ,80 progression). So if you win 20 times in a row you make $100 profit. ($5x20). However all it takes 1 TIME to lose 5 progressions and you lose $155 (5+10+20+40+80). Meaning all your winning of 20 times of success plus more. 1 time of failure wipes out more than 20 times of success. That's the idea of PROGRESSION MANAGEMENT.
By the way this SYSTEM of DOTS, can be expanded to a system of CORNER BETS that get ahead form the rest. But it's very hard to mark corner bets, on a score card. it will get confusing unless you write them on a separate paper.
Or you can test it with DOUBLE STREET BETS (6 NUMBERS), IT SHOULD KICK IN SOONER THAN 30 SPINS. I haven't done it because I like to play few numbers, but the same logic applies.