Yes Reyth Charles stole peoples money.
This is well known to the members of the forums some years ago when the site of Charles was still active.
Charles was posting in every page on his site that he hated gamblers and lazy people.People that want everything to be easy for them and not work their asses to make something good with their lives.
Charles had also stated more than one times that none should give money to anyone for sending the bet. Because none with normal brains would give something like this away , not even for a ton of money.
So Charles really warned everyone not to give money...
In the end he said in his site that he will give a bet away for 500 dollars if i remember correct the prize.
Then he took the peoples money and closed his site and his emails.
IF my bet that passes all the sessions as it should (Impossible if you haven t found a real flat bet winner) wouldn t obey his site clues of his bet , then I would also believe that this man was a scam.
You can t say that he didn t worned them!
Clue no1 I HATE GUMBLERS
Clue no 2 I HATE LAZY PEOPLE THAT DO NOT WORK TO FIND THE BET AN THEY WANT IT WITHOUT ANY WORK
Clue no 3 NEVER SEND MONEY TO ANYONE FOR THE BET EVEN IF HE SAID IT WAS ME
(These are the things that Charles was posting in his site all the time)
So he did good that he stole the money from these people... simply because he wanted to revenge the lazy gamblers.
I never sent him any money ... and I started to think that he was a scam after his stealing...But I never gave up my research because this man was speaking so specific and with so much passion that I knew he was maybe telling the truth.
Anyone that thinks that I am a fool he can try to bet any FLAT bet selection in 3500 spins in 100 spins sessions and 31 of 35 sessions to end up in + (From +1 to +40) and the 4 sessions that didn t made + to be less than -10 each.
If you haven t found a real winner ... these results are impossible , even if you will exclude zero ass a loss.
In my tests i had teh zero as a loss of corce.
I had wasted 8 years of my life flat betting every idea of bet selection and the best (Lucky) selection had passed only 14 sessions of 100 spins with + and then it was getting down down down (as the negative expectation of the game)
So when I found a bet selection that is EXACTLY on the clues of Charles and passed 31 sessions and only 4 had less than -10 , I have no reason to believe that the man was not telling the truth.
The ultimate test of charles for a CWB was to pass 28 sessions with + and 1 or 2 to be less than -10.
I know the power of the disadvantage (-2,7).
I have witnessed it in every bet selection I was testing all these years ... we are speaking about hundreads of bet selections!
When you see such results that are spot on on Charles clues you have no reason to not believe him.