Another variation is to bet what won 2 events ago. If it repeats you win, if it chops you win. The weakness is if you get caught up in a series of double chops (double alternating decisions). Double chops do occur somewhat less often than single chops or repeats.THIS IS A SYSTEM POSTED BY SOMEONE A FEW YEARS AGO IN SOME SITE. YOU MAY FIND IT INTERESTING
RRRR = Win
RBRB = Win
RRBB = Loss
This is a strategy which I have come up with, I have
tested it with multiple random number generators
and have been using it in live play. So far it has
it been producing very good results in live play.
Presently there are a few members of this forum
using it and a few personal friends. If you would
like to get a little more insight into the strategy
I suggest you read the Red/Black thread here on
the forum. I have received a few IM’s from members
asking for more details and can the strategy be
used with a small bankroll, so I thought I’d try to
lay out the strategy in a separate thread.
First let me say this is not the so called “Holy Grail.”
So if your looking for an easy way to win this
definitely isn’t it. This is a grind and there’s no
guarantees you’ll win.
The strategy is based on streaks of red and black.
All your bets will be determined by the color of the
prior spin. The theory behind the strategy is that
the law of appearance states all series of even money
chances will account for 3/4 of all trials and single
even money chance only account for 1/4 of those
trails. A series is 2 or more of the same (RR, BB, RRR,
BBB, RRRR, BBBB, .....) If you were to run a RNG
test of 100,000 spins, 75,000 of those spins would
approximately account for series of 2 or more and the
remaining 25,000 spins would account for single events.
I know it may sound crazy, but it is true! The Laws
of Distribution and Appearance can easily be verified.
Yes there will always be deviations but if you ran
many test you’ll see the ratio always comes near that
3/4 series to 1/4 single events. The theory of this strategy
is to try to capitalize on those series of red and black.
The strategy has 4 levels of play, with each level giving
you 6 betting steps. The odds of losing 6 of these betting
steps is approximately 1 in 64. Thus for the strategy to
totally collapse the odds are approximately (1 in 64) (1 in 64)
(1 in 64) (1 in 64). In my RNG testing I did suffer a few
total losts of all 4 levels. The thing is I was way
ahead at the time and was able to handle the losts, and
each time I was able to recover my losts and reach new
highs before the next lost. In my limited live play of the
strategy I haven’t yet suffered a lost of all 4 levels. I’m
up a little over $6,000 in live play and a lost is definitely
due. The strategy requires a sizable bankroll of 173 units,
if you use $10 units that amounts to $1,730 investment.
I have scaled the bankroll down for one of the members
here on the forum and as of today he’s doing well and
up about $1,000 but only plays for a 5% profit goal per
session. I also have a personal friend who plays this
strategy with $50 units and HAS had one lost so far,
but even after that lost he is still showing a profit of
Remember this strategy is based on a “hit and run” game.
I personally only play for 4 to 5 units profit per table. I
average any where between 4 to 40 spins per session.
Must of the time I reach my goal of 4 to 5 units per table in
under 20 spins and then move to another table.
Here are the bets for the strategy:
(Level 1 - $10-$16-$22-$28-$34-$40 = $150 (Up $6 on a lost, down $4 on win.)
(Level 2 - $15-$24-$33-$42-$51-$60 = $225 (Up $9 on a lost, down $6 on win.)
(Level 3 - $30-$48-$66-$84-$102-$120 = $450 ( Up $18 on a lost, down $12 on win.)
(Level 4 - $60-$96-$132-$168-$204-$240 = $900 ( Up $36 on a lost, down $24 on win.)
Any two consecutive wins decrease to whatever level value of the that level, (if Level 3
and win two bets in a row instead of going down $18 you decrease by $30),
but never lower than the starting level amount.