No, the knee-jerk reaction here is to say "4 units, that sucks" without realizing the full import and significance of any profit over a million trials. You can't gain even 1 unit of profit without a very significant edge.-Reyth
It's insignificant, and no edge would be required. It would be very easy to design an up as you lose progression that would enable the player to be in profit after 1 million trials. Being up 4 units is meaningless. Along the way, to a million plus spins, the player would likely be experiencing negative fluctuations requiring hundreds of thousands or even millions of dollars in order to recoup the losses encountered along the way.
If the player was up four units while flat betting for one million spins, then that would be more impressive, but the trivial edge would be far far too low to make it worth while, or interesting enough to "seriously" play.
You still don't understand the point that Reyth and I are making. Many members are looking to make a megabucks profit while some, like Reyth and, I are quite happy to take any profit.So, it is different strokes for different folks
Just how , for instance can you say that you could easily devise a system that would produce an insignificant profit when you previously have said that any Method would lose over the long term ?
And also say that no edge is necessary for such an insignificant when you have also claimed that you need to create an edge ?
As I have said you are talking about betting being "worthwhile" while I and Reyth are content NOT to lose and PROVE - as you now agree- that it is NOT true that we must lose in the long run using a Method
Thanks for the confirmation..