Recent Posts

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 10
11
I stress this patent because it admits the the  casino has direct control over a bias helper setting
12
Questions and Answers / Re: Book of roulette
« Last post by scepticus on June 26, 2017, 04:09:46 PM »

Thomas
You can denigrate me as much as you like but the plain  fact remains that no matter how you  calculate your bets in roulette  you cannot  overcome the House Edge without first making an assumption .
You really do need to come into the real  world  of gambling - and come to that - into the real world !

13
Questions and Answers / Re: Book of roulette
« Last post by thomasleor on June 26, 2017, 03:50:55 PM »

Thomas
( YOUR book ? )says that

"Everyone accepts that we have no rule over the hazard. Everyone also accepts that in long run, we will never take the house edge. This is true for any game of chance "

so just why should I learn advanced Maths  when they give me no advantage  in playing roulette ? If I do okay with what I do why should I change when there is no benefit ?
It also says somewhere about a 90% advantage . if it is an actual  advantage then that is Bull - with a capital B !
If it has a probability of 90% then it is short of  7.3 % isn't it ?


Idiot.
14
Questions and Answers / Re: Book of roulette
« Last post by scepticus on June 26, 2017, 03:47:29 PM »

Thomas
( YOUR book ? )says that

"Everyone accepts that we have no rule over the hazard. Everyone also accepts that in long run, we will never take the house edge. This is true for any game of chance "

so just why should I learn advanced Maths  when they give me no advantage  in playing roulette ? If I do okay with what I do why should I change when there is no benefit ?
It also says somewhere about a 90% advantage . if it is an actual  advantage then that is Bull - with a capital B !
If it has a probability of 90% then it is short of  7.3 % isn't it ?
You really do need to come into the real  world of gambling , Thomas.
15
Questions and Answers / Re: Book of roulette
« Last post by thomasleor on June 26, 2017, 02:56:10 PM »
Bla...bla..bla...The whining...Man....Almost unbearable...But then at your age its understandable. Do you talk like that with walls too  when people stop listening to that senile crapola?

I mean you say basically that you haven´t read the book, and yet you deem it unsuitable according to your assumptions, based on what? A hunch, or long experience of never reading any book, at all? Do they mass produce idiots where you come from, or are you some kind of unique idiot savant in self-chosen ignorance and wild gestimations?  ;D
16
Questions and Answers / Re: Book of roulette
« Last post by scepticus on June 26, 2017, 01:08:10 PM »


 :-[ You are proving my point  Thomas .
You are full of SH*T  !

To a numerical illiterate like yourself,  Sceppy boy, anyone able to understand the intricate correlation between Roulette and applied Mathematics, is full of s***. 8)

So you admit that you are full of SH*T  ?
As for this being a roulette forum I  assumed  that  JJohnny was looking for a METHOD using a maths based approach . I don't think that The  Book you mention has any Methods  in it.
  .The odds in favour of the casino cannot  be wished away by maths alone  unless we first make an assumption
so your  "intricate correlation between roulette and  applied mathematics " is clearly unnecessary -  except in your fevered mind..
Your reference to my "100 E " bankroll reveals  your  ignorance of my previous post / s where I said that I could AFFORD a lot more but chose not to.. I treat roulette as a hobby  - unlike you and your imaginary huge profits .
17
Questions and Answers / Re: Book of roulette
« Last post by thomasleor on June 26, 2017, 08:39:10 AM »
That puts your mathematical skills at below kindergarten level.

Please don't forget the object you are referring to in your videos isn't even an equation.
Have a nice day ...

The platform wasn´t based on the object. Anyone with even a drop of intelligence, having watched the rest of the video, should be able to conclude that.

The equation for the superposition principle you were jonsing for is found here:

http://physics.gmu.edu/~dmaria/590%20Web%20Page/public_html/qm_topics/superposition/superposition.html

Have a nice day.
18
Questions and Answers / Re: Book of roulette
« Last post by Herby on June 26, 2017, 08:08:32 AM »
That puts your mathematical skills at below kindergarten level.

Please don't forget the object you are referring to in your videos isn't even an equation.
Have a nice day ...
19
Questions and Answers / Re: Book of roulette
« Last post by thomasleor on June 26, 2017, 08:02:47 AM »

 :-[ You are proving my point  Thomas .
You are full of SH*T  !

To a numerical illiterate like yourself,  Sceppy boy, anyone able to understand the intricate correlation between Roulette and applied Mathematics, is full of s***. 8)
20
Don't fret. These wheels have been best source of money for AP for a while already.
    These guys are so dumb as their understanding of drop zone bias. They have no clue whatsoever what makes player to win, wich is good for them ( risk of heart attack is reduced) and players.
    I spoke with their head engineering guy ( the one who developed low profile wheels) on few different ocasions  , all l can say, he is not a treat to player community. 
    These are good wheels for entry level players .
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 10