BetOnline

Author Topic: Positive Progression Analysis  (Read 4815 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

kav

  • www.Roulette30.com
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1933
  • Thanked: 923 times
  • Gender: Male
Re: Positive Progression Analysis
« Reply #15 on: October 03, 2017, 12:37:40 AM »
Reyth I think he did, in his previous post
It would be nice to have a combined chart with the graphs of all 4 progressions.
But it is not an easy job.

Btw, just for reference and because my stats show the results for 8 consecutive wins, that 8 consecutive wins in Simple Chances (red, black, etc.) will take 256 streak sequences (not spins) to happen. This means if you record continuous steaks, a 8 win sequence will happen once in 256 streaks. The outer right column shows how many steaks of each length will be in 256 streaks.

How we count streaks. We chose a bet, for example Red. Every time Red hits the streak begins. When Black hits the steak ends. We count how many consecutive Reds we had before Black. If we had 3 Reds, then this is one streak of 3 Reds. A streak of 8 consecutive Reds will happen once in 256 streaks of Red.
« Last Edit: October 03, 2017, 02:14:48 AM by kav »
 

Reyth

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3951
  • Thanked: 1274 times
Re: Positive Progression Analysis
« Reply #16 on: October 03, 2017, 12:50:48 AM »
I have looked at these expectation figures in This Thread.  I think there is something to this and can be made into a powerful system.
 
The following users thanked this post: kav

kav

  • www.Roulette30.com
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1933
  • Thanked: 923 times
  • Gender: Male
Re: Positive Progression Analysis
« Reply #17 on: October 03, 2017, 02:15:55 AM »
Yes indeed.
 

Reyth

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3951
  • Thanked: 1274 times
Re: Positive Progression Analysis
« Reply #18 on: October 03, 2017, 03:29:34 AM »
Heck, hot numbers and positive progressions are DYNAMITE together!


I wish someone would pick this ball up and run with it HERE
« Last Edit: October 03, 2017, 03:32:58 AM by Reyth »
 
The following users thanked this post: kav

dobbelsteen

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1497
  • Thanked: 475 times
Re: Positive Progression Analysis
« Reply #19 on: October 03, 2017, 08:27:44 AM »
Kav The theory or the triangle of Blaise Pascal learns us that 8 spins of an EC can create 256 different rows of 8 outcomes. This is only the case of a unique sample.8 Random spins gives a total else picture. On this forum I already have published a program to count the streaks
 
The following users thanked this post: Reyth

Sputnik

  • Veteran Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 534
  • Thanked: 453 times
Re: Positive Progression Analysis
« Reply #20 on: October 04, 2017, 09:42:18 AM »




The selection process is the hard part to tackle.
I test 1248 and got pretty good results.

Cheers
 

dobbelsteen

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1497
  • Thanked: 475 times
Re: Positive Progression Analysis
« Reply #21 on: October 04, 2017, 10:03:15 AM »
Again beautiful pictures with more beautiful performances. One thing is absent and that is a clear explanation.
I think it is the earth temperature  caused by the climate change. I see no connection with the roulette game.
 
The following users thanked this post: Reyth

dobbelsteen

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1497
  • Thanked: 475 times
Re: Positive Progression Analysis
« Reply #22 on: October 04, 2017, 10:25:22 AM »
I have tryed to find the Neilas system on internet  without result. Can you give an description?
 
The following users thanked this post: Reyth

Sputnik

  • Veteran Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 534
  • Thanked: 453 times
Re: Positive Progression Analysis
« Reply #23 on: October 04, 2017, 01:53:07 PM »


 I can explain - i use Sputnik's March and have 3K views on betselection cc
 There is many different ways using Sputnik's March and i play opposite

 Have explain the method on this forum, but not many understand the value of my discovery ...

 I also test 12 positiv progression and is work in the same way stacking 1248 but the win ratio is smaller ...



 Cheers
« Last Edit: October 04, 2017, 02:06:39 PM by Sputnik »
 

dobbelsteen

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1497
  • Thanked: 475 times
Re: Positive Progression Analysis
« Reply #24 on: October 04, 2017, 03:06:28 PM »

 Programming the guetting system is not easy.

Here the program statement for the betting.

I have attached an picture of 6 samples. As predictable the results are not stable.
 

Reyth

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3951
  • Thanked: 1274 times
Re: Positive Progression Analysis
« Reply #25 on: October 04, 2017, 03:11:20 PM »
Above 0 is stable enough for me! :D
 

Sputnik

  • Veteran Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 534
  • Thanked: 453 times
Re: Positive Progression Analysis
« Reply #26 on: October 04, 2017, 04:06:38 PM »


I will just mention this for does who understand - when to enter the game selection is up to your methodology but i would strongly recommend looking at reversals for when to quit and exit the game - that is by it self a very good indicator ...

Guetting need to win three times in a row to turnaround into the positiv area ... that make it a very bad staking plan

Cheers
 

Reyth

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3951
  • Thanked: 1274 times
Re: Positive Progression Analysis
« Reply #27 on: October 04, 2017, 05:04:38 PM »
I definitely think it is not "very bad" but that you have shown us how to make it even better. ;)
 

dobbelsteen

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1497
  • Thanked: 475 times
Re: Positive Progression Analysis
« Reply #28 on: October 04, 2017, 07:49:50 PM »
pleas can you tell me where I can find Sputnik` s March. Is it a method, system or a roulette tool?
 
The following users thanked this post: Reyth

Bebediktus

  • Mature Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 265
  • Thanked: 96 times
Re: Positive Progression Analysis
« Reply #29 on: October 04, 2017, 09:21:23 PM »
I not want nothing bad , but looks that you really not want to win .....
You all really think, that this way is possible to win  ?