Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10

Interesting post, Kav. So what exactly made those fingers of yours type this post? Your genome, brain and its psychophysiological functions put aside, was it free will combined with a measure of desire and inspiration (extracted from the ancient lat. word in spiritus), or was it a higher power, or a more sinister one?

Few people on this planet know their true nature and what really makes them able to move around their bodies in accordance with a will too obscure to identify its true origin. If you do, then you are truly on par with the old Greek philosophers. If not, then you are in the same boat as the rest of us, sailing towards destinations beyond our purview, but certainly within our will and desire to explore.
Roulette Systems / Re: Palestis' DS trends
« Last post by Reyth on Today at 08:25:36 AM »
The way I see it, the entire board is more likely to hit than the last number, from a static probability perspective.
Roulette Systems / Re: The Bomb Shelter
« Last post by Reyth on Today at 04:25:23 AM »
Thanks EF!

Something needs to be done because even though it works, it is quite unwieldy.  Not sure which way I should go from here. :)
Roulette Systems / Re: NEW SYSTEM: SINGLE DOZEN
« Last post by Reyth on Today at 12:12:14 AM »
Wow me too :(
Roulette Systems / Re: Cluster DS Randomization
« Last post by Reyth on Yesterday at 10:59:26 PM »
I have also vigorously tested various of his systems and they all lose.  Your point about swings in recovery I have also learned quite well and its why I don't play unless I have the highest probability (practically speaking) to hit at all times. 

In my times of deep frustration trying to figure out how he wins, I have questioned his veracity as well.

Applying his recovery techniques with 99.16% chance of getting a hit has worked very well for me.  Along the way of adapting this, I also discovered a very good bet selection technique.

I simply don't feel like going back and trying his systems to see if I can do it with recovery alone or just recovery and bet selection. :shrug: Maybe I can try his methods with my bet selection and see what happens but I just don't feel like doing it right now; I have alot going on with work and am tired and such.

I learned alot from his recovery methods and I am happy with that. :)
Casino Lounge / Re: Gamblers Fallacy as a positive tool
« Last post by MrPerfect. on Yesterday at 09:06:58 PM »
Mickey,  no offences taken.
  AP do not make mistakes on ball in use. He may loose some time to determine it for sure ( online for example).
 Good AP play only when he has advantage, play itself is execution of plan. When losses on the row come, AP stop playing , unless he understands that it's random fluctuation ( happens as well).
   There is a big difference between what he thinks ( Dobbelsteen) and reality.  AP require eyes open ;) .
    I'm just tired of reading whatever....
 There is no difference between good AP and good system player ( edge aside), both technically should use same way of thinking to develop strategies and betting plans.  Both definitely should look wheel and process all information available.  There are ways of play that are beyond both AP and systems, but even these require wheel dinamics understanding. 
    If such methods ever mentioned, AP would call these systems and system players would think it's AP.... after a while with total understanding of the wheel, boundary between these 2 dissipates.
   That's why l like read some new ideas ...
  In fact everyone does same..  all go to forums, copy/ paste posts... ets.
   Curios thing.. after going for many forums and copy/ pasting, deleting bs... l got in my library only 3 posts... it's from 5 forums!!! Do you imagine my frustration with forums in general?
Roulette Strategy Discussion / Re: Pay close attention
« Last post by Reyth on Yesterday at 12:00:42 AM »
Here is a video example:

Spin me any 300 length sequence of roulette numbers and I will prove it there as well.
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10