Thanks for the replies.
Reyth, are you paranoid? clearly you knew I was not talking about you. furthermore, just because you believe you understand what the question of TOW means, does not actually make it a fact. There are many flaws that the wheel has as far as data produced. I myself, read the talos response differently than you do on this topic / interpretation.
Talos said........ "Jerome, one of the problem you have is very inside the Western way to think, that is always /or, while the Eastern way is often /and. That is because you assumed that a sentence deny all other than itself."
He also said....."I think CANONS more relevant are:
20 (it means I do not play a even chances method. What I play changes during the game)
36 (the weakness of the wheel, the only point where all mathematicians attacked the game)
37 to 40
54 (do not take it literally though. A hit at any point changes the rest of the sequence)"
I INTERPRET THIS DIFFERENTLY THAN YOU~
With the language barrier, this is even more possible.
another Talos quote....
"Reyth, I really admire your efforts and some of the conclusions you reached. I think you have a very mathematical mind, and your commitment to find my system is remarkable.
Many of the things that you write here are not easy to understand for me. I'd say my system is way more simple than yours, and way more easy to manage at the table.
What you still miss is the "revolutionary" idea beneath my system, but is ok because otherwise I never would be comfortable to talk about it. As you may remember, my goal was to push people toward the result of their own HG, not giving mine (I know this is unforgivable, my true and darkest sin). Took decades for me to arrange my system (yes, you are right, I wrote a lot in order to find out the best way to proceed), I don't think you or anybody else will get in a couple months. People get angry and delusional for this makes me laugh. If you could know how much money I have lost at the table before finding my HG...
I saw your video, and sure you get the boring part of my system. About the recovery, I tell you I never play quads.
I am not a very aggressive player. I am a guy easy to get emotional and I don't want to see too much units on the table. So, I try to find a way to keep my balance always under control, and the bet always surprisingly low."
AND another ....
" I said several times that the ratio was my way to make more "mathematically speaking" comprehensible my system, but was not my way of thinking. Reyth was really into it, and I think was a very good way to approach the system. Still his, not mine.
I don't think Jerome or others will get my system, and if they get they will not tell me publicly, so I am sure I will not have to make it public. If they message me proving me they had the answer to my question, they have a working system (even without revealing it. I will understand if they are lying or not) I will be happy and proud, and I will cheer their success."
My point for asking the questions I did, is because I see many people on the forum, "lurking" and not posting opinions on this topic. On the home screen, I just recently realized, you can see who has visited a specific topic and when. There is an unusually large amount of followers that might just have an opinion on my questions asked. They may even conform to your opinion, s***, in the long run, I may even agree with you. I just simply want to look at every angle more than once.
There is no question, the play he uses is fragmented and deduced. The 1/3 rule is an obvious flaw. But there are more......
I see a large discrepancy in the talos logic....if he is playing with $5 units, and is into the game with a 171 units draw down= 855$, to make an 11 unit profit= 55$, I would not actually consider this a bet that uses small amounts of units to recover at any given bet scheme. GRANTED, he makes it work for himself, because he has worked it from small units first, and has no fear of the process, but it is not what I would consider exactly in proportion of risk / reward.
TO BE ABSOLUTLY CLEAR ON MY POSITION.......I DO BELIEVE HE IS GENUINE, but for most players, just not practical, at this point.
ROULETTE MAN, GREAT WORK!
REYTH- ALL RESPECT TO YOU.