728x90 welcome bonus

Author Topic: Dobble's Short Run Theory  (Read 280 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

scepticus

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2055
  • Thanked: 426 times
Re: Dobble's Short Run Theory
« Reply #30 on: October 12, 2017, 04:53:55 PM »
Dobbelsteen
You say
" roulette has no timeline only an infinite sequence"
THAT is what I have been arguing !
No computer simulation can cope with an infinite sequence . Computer simulations are used to calculate what the user wants to calculate - nothing more. It is pointless to use simulations to discover if  a method / system can overcome the HE because if you insert a negative then the answer will always be negative.You should not need a computer to tell you that . Just use your common sense .
 

Reyth

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3637
  • Thanked: 1137 times
Re: Dobble's Short Run Theory
« Reply #31 on: October 12, 2017, 05:26:44 PM »
Our roulette sessions will always be a closed circuit.
 

dobbelsteen

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1414
  • Thanked: 376 times
Re: Dobble's Short Run Theory
« Reply #32 on: October 12, 2017, 08:44:17 PM »
Only with the help of the computer, I can show you more than 100 samples all with the same features. After about 250 spins all the samples have a loss of about 2,7%. I think with 1000 samples I can not convince you.

You are sticked in your AP. Every discussion with you about random rows is useless