Author Topic: Testing Actual Spins vs RNG  (Read 9704 times)

kav

  • www.Roulette30.com
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1600
  • Thanked: 652 times
  • Gender: Male
Re: Testing Actual Spins vs RNG
« Reply #120 on: February 26, 2017, 01:56:07 PM »
Wow!
 

scepticus

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1712
  • Thanked: 341 times
Re: Testing Actual Spins vs RNG
« Reply #121 on: February 26, 2017, 02:55:14 PM »
Wow!

WOW  ! indeed kav. Needs some digesting !
 

MrPerfect.

  • Veteran Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 608
  • Thanked: 378 times
Re: Testing Actual Spins vs RNG
« Reply #122 on: March 13, 2017, 11:50:49 AM »
 I always wondered why people do not present their systems on simple and logical way. Instead folks mention strange terms that has nothing to do with their system in the first place.... it's a mess to understand it.
   Would be nice to have some conventional language to describe these things that everyone can understand. 
 
The following users thanked this post: jekhb76

BlueAngel

  • I always express my opinion
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1437
  • Thanked: 196 times
  • Gender: Male
  • Do you want truth? You cannot handle the truth!
Re: Testing Actual Spins vs RNG
« Reply #123 on: March 13, 2017, 12:02:22 PM »
1 out of 100 is not very strong when it comes to roulette.  Our problem is that in order to mint cash we have to hit up the ATM repeatedly and with great frequency.  1 out of 100 is really very very close....

But I think Harry/Pales' point is that we don't expose ourselves in that way, but segment our betting in small chunks so that we get even more favorable odds; i.e. 1 out of 100 turns into the equivalent of 1 out of 250.

They have actually discovered a method to do this.

Breaking down a dollar in 4 quarters doesn't have any difference...
The only difference is that you pay little by little instead at once...