Friends Good evening .. or rather good morning.Ninth day.
Spins 60. Game: 5 streets (15 numbers) turnover in chips 60x5 = 300
Hits: 24 Return = 288. That is 96%. Rake: -4%
Days 9. Spins: 540
Return of 86%. rake -14%.Day 10th.
Balls 60. Game: 4 carre (16 numbers) turnover in chips 60x4 = 240
Hits: 25 Return = 225. Ie 93.75%. Rake -6.25%Total. 10 days. Spins 600
Average return 86.78%
Average rake(house edge): -13.22%
On two recent days the rates of losses were smaller than average.
However, as known (so far) -13.22% is far worse from the (theoretical) -2.7%.
So when various people tell us that over time it is impossible for any system and method of roulette play to change the-2.7% to be even +1%, and that's the sole reason we lose...
When a casino employee told me the words .. 'Mathematics is absolute, whatever you do the -1/37 will prevail. The more you'll bet, the more you'll lose '
Let us explain how the 'absolute' -2,7% proves to be so far - 13% ? If -2.7% is impossible to become +1%, then how has it become -13%?!