Author Topic: Scep' s roulette strategies .  (Read 46839 times)

scepticus

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1710
  • Thanked: 339 times
Re: Scep' s roulette strategies .
« Reply #330 on: April 11, 2017, 01:09:45 PM »
  LAST 5 NUMBERS  BET

I have ridiculed Real’s Last Five Numbers   Bet  because
a ) He has presented a Method while he ridicules Methods , and
b ) because he attempts to justify it by saying the Bettor MIGHT be playing  a biased wheel.
    Depending on “MIGHT  “ is silliness pesonified.
This idea, anyway, is not new. Many have noticed that sometimes numbers do recur within a few spins .
This idea could even be justified by the use of “ The Law of the Thirds “. This “ law “ maintains that , in any series of 37 spins then at least  12 numbers will  not have appeared. This leaves 25 numbers which have appeared in the last 37 spins and “our” last 5 numbers are one-fifth of that so one of those has a 1 in 5 chance of occurring in the last 5 numbers  spun. So  the Bettor may have   an advantage  but is still subject to variance.
Who needs “ MIGHT “ ? or AP ?
 Just a thought !
 

dobbelsteen

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1218
  • Thanked: 286 times
Re: Scep' s roulette strategies .
« Reply #331 on: April 13, 2017, 08:41:25 AM »
Real knows very less ., how to play systems and strategies. I advice him to study my theory about the short and long run features and  what means DTOP.
We  system players are donkeys and he repeats his opinion again and again.
He discusses as a creator
 
The following users thanked this post: Reyth

scepticus

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1710
  • Thanked: 339 times
Re: Scep' s roulette strategies .
« Reply #332 on: April 21, 2017, 12:23:57 AM »

The claim that we must lose “in the Long Run” is absurd  unless a  timeline is given .
What is seldom realised is that Roulette has a  multinomial distribution so is extremely difficult to analyse properly .
Probability Theory deals with probabilities not the certainties some claim.
Gambling is about overcoming the unfair odds on offer . We don’t aim to be “Right “ but to profit .
We have the option to start and stop when we like so don’t need to meet any criteria set by our critics .WE decide - not them .
 
The following users thanked this post: Reyth

Reyth

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3181
  • Thanked: 911 times
Re: Scep' s roulette strategies .
« Reply #333 on: April 21, 2017, 12:53:44 AM »
Quote
In probability theory, the multinomial distribution is a generalization of the binomial distribution. For example, it models the probability of counts for rolling a k-sided dice n times. For n independent trials each of which leads to a success for exactly one of k categories, with each category having a given fixed success probability, the multinomial distribution gives the probability of any particular combination of numbers of successes for the various categories.

So do you mean categories of:

SU
Split
Street
Quad
DS
Dozen
EC

and furthermore, similarly sized groups from the wheel?

If so, its interesting that you would mention this in connection with "gambler's fallacy theory" arguments...
« Last Edit: April 21, 2017, 12:56:58 AM by Reyth »
 

scepticus

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1710
  • Thanked: 339 times
Re: Scep' s roulette strategies .
« Reply #334 on: April 21, 2017, 01:26:02 AM »

Yes, Reyth
This could explain the 18 phenomenon.
 

Reyth

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3181
  • Thanked: 911 times
Re: Scep' s roulette strategies .
« Reply #335 on: April 21, 2017, 01:32:55 AM »
I don't see an explanation for the 18's anywhere I look; I mean 16 Dozen IN A ROW!?  16 DS IN A ROW!? etc.

I cannot see the random flow as "competing statistical groups that act independently" but rather as different statistical perspectives that can help us to better understand what is happining (and maybe even likely to happen) in the random flow?
 

scepticus

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1710
  • Thanked: 339 times
Re: Scep' s roulette strategies .
« Reply #336 on: April 23, 2017, 11:31:38 AM »

                                                                  A 5 - 4  EDGE

Using the 9 column Block for Dozens or Columns we can have a 5/4 advantage over 2 consecutive spins.Simply bet the 2 indicated dozens or columns after the first 2 spins which are virtual bets.  You should be aware that we are still subjected to variance so there can be no guarantee of profit - only an expectation of profit.
111222333
123123123
231312123
231123312
If you look at , say, Line 1 .The first 2 spins the 2 numbers below are 2 followed by 2. If you look at all 9  of the last 2 spins you will find that 5 of them contain 2 which gives us an edge of 5/4. Even allowing for 1 zero in every average 37 spins we still have an edge. We are still subject to variance  however .
NOTE
 The first 2 are not bet ( hence “Virtual bets  ) but are only used to indicate what to bet on the next two spins.
 

scepticus

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1710
  • Thanked: 339 times
Re: Scep' s roulette strategies .
« Reply #337 on: April 25, 2017, 04:19:51 PM »

                                                           NEVER  BET  ZERO  !
WHY ?     
Because
1 ) It has no better chance than any other number.
2 ) To profit we must leave out some numbers . So why not zero ?
3 ) Unlike other numbers it cannot be used
In Dozens
In Columns
In Red / Black
In Odd  / Even
In High / Low
In a Street
In a Double Street
So why do Bettors bet Zero ?
The FEAR factor - because it MIGHT come up.
Don’t let it mess with your mind !
Concentrate on your method and FORGET the zero . It is only ONE number among another 36 .