Author Topic: Nine Waves  (Read 2553 times)

Reyth

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3337
  • Thanked: 988 times
Re: Nine Waves
« Reply #30 on: April 10, 2017, 07:17:14 PM »
The forced loss is -1200 units which is a table bank.

There is however:

1) Small Loss -- 2+ progression losses, scrap back to less than -100
2) Emergency Bailout -- 700-800 debt, successively lower until -300 to -400
3) Mini Bailout -- between Small Loss and Emergency Bailout but ended because of slower recovery at -100 to -200

These 3 are to avoid counter swings and also avoid the forced loss.

I think this is definitely workable and there are many options available for tweaking.

Thanks for your input King Ignatus! :D
« Last Edit: April 10, 2017, 07:20:23 PM by Reyth »
 
The following users thanked this post: ignatus, zibaanna

Rinad

  • Mature Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 218
  • Thanked: 282 times
Re: Nine Waves
« Reply #31 on: April 11, 2017, 02:33:50 AM »


  Reyth, just finishing reading the whole thread of your 9 waves system. a lot of hard work you have done there.
I see that playing for real money did not turn out well. I am just curious. do you trust the casino you played out of ?   was it a online casino?

the system seems like it performed so well for so long I am surprise it did what it did, and makes you doubt your performance. you had a lot of practice with it. strange coincidence.
God bless,
Rinad
 

Reyth

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3337
  • Thanked: 988 times
Re: Nine Waves
« Reply #32 on: April 11, 2017, 03:07:49 AM »
Hey thanks Rinad!

Yes, I trust the online casino I play at, I know someone that has a winning system that plays there.

I am aghast at what happened and I have no way to actually prove if it is a coincidence or not.  I think it has got to be the most bizarre thing, timing wise -- I just don't know.

The system can be tweaked and improved to reduce risk because it generates profit quite strongly.

In the future I just can't afford to trust non-money spins; if I don't get hammered by the "toy RNG" then it is only the entry level to an acceptable system.  Ideally I should always be using real money spins to seriously test, at all times.
 

Jake007

  • Veteran Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 361
  • Thanked: 246 times
  • "Topcats often start out as underdogs."
Re: Nine Waves
« Reply #33 on: May 12, 2017, 06:00:59 PM »
Reyth... I dont understand, can you help explain? So you were playing all of this with test credits or with real money? And also... if you were up 12,000 units and suffered some defeats, I dont see a big deal.

However, I will tell you I notice a difference when I play test credits vs. real credits. Its not necessarily a huge difference, but playing over time I notice it. I cant pinpoint it other than saying profit doesnt come as fast. I should do an analysis of say 1000+ spins with test vs. real credits. Would be interesting.
 

Reyth

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3337
  • Thanked: 988 times
Re: Nine Waves
« Reply #34 on: May 12, 2017, 06:17:54 PM »
I was using a simulator and not casino spins and every time I switched to casino spins, I would notice larger drawdowns and more frequent losses.

I basically let this go because it is less efficient than it can be, even though it works really well.  The increased losses make it not as worth it, as was first apparent.