No, I said for the 1st sequence to be from Skycity.
Yes, you replied that 1 of you is correct but I didn't remember what was your exact reply, that's why the confusion.
Since my choices were not better than selecting on random and below average, perhaps it's better not to go on with the rest in order another person be able to attempt find them out.
I was reading 1 of your posts and I've a question;
You said by choosing to stay with the same EC ALL time, you didn't find big difference than by changing the target, although you did mention that the same EC had extended loses, I assume more than changing EC target, right?
I'm of the opinion that adjusting the target could be better than staying all the time on the same, do you agree?
When something has to change, the next reasonable question is what criterion are you going to use.
For example, we could agree that changing target is optimal, but we could not agree with what criterion should determine the change.
A test can prove that a bet which stays always in the same position, with the same amount it is destined to lose.
So this means that by alternating our bets in terms of amounts and where to place them could make us winners.
The next reasonable question is not if I'm going to use criteria, but WHAT criteria.