BetVoyager Portal

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10
21
Roulette Systems / Re: 6 Number System
« Last post by Scarface on Yesterday at 09:28:40 PM »
Mickeyp,  what do you mean about alternating hits?  Alternating hits shouldn't affect unless they're from the same ds
22
Roulette Systems / Re: 6 Number System
« Last post by Scarface on Yesterday at 09:26:33 PM »
Jesper, from my experience playing hits do come in clusters.  A positive progression would work well with that.  If I get a hit within 6 spins, it's in the money and I continue to flatbet.  But, if it goes beyond 6 spins, it's probably best to wait till the hit comes then raise the bet
23
Roulette Systems / Re: 6 Number System
« Last post by Jesper on Yesterday at 06:00:09 PM »
Playing six numbers (more or less) is to try catch a cluster of repeaters.  Therefore a positive progression is best, as a negative escalate rather fast. The cluster may come later.  If we add a chip on a hit, we will not favour the numbers showing less.  On the third hit the pay is 108 - the total bet.

I use to bet as they come. And have post my play here. We will have a hit before 8 spins half the time add a new as they come.

This is a strong method, if played using low unit value, we can  fetch a cluster, and almost all time come out positive.
If we run on NOZ winning will be more easy, but the bank needs to be larger.
24
Casino Lounge / Re: Gamblers Fallacy as a positive tool
« Last post by MickyP on Yesterday at 05:11:49 PM »
Wonderful post Reyth. I know that we are all constantly learning and in the process we sometimes ask awkward questions like this one. There are now two very strong opinions on the subject that will encourage others not to beaten down with gamblers fallacy. Never-the-less we should always have our wits about ourselves and not take anything for granted.
25
Casino Lounge / Re: What would be an example of NON-independent outcomes?
« Last post by MrPerfect. on Yesterday at 04:40:08 PM »
Always welcome.  Just remember that both skips and consequtive hits dinamics should be statistically significant. 
26
Casino Lounge / Re: What would be an example of NON-independent outcomes?
« Last post by Reyth on Yesterday at 04:22:54 PM »
Aha!  Moar light shed on this topic!!  Now I see how to program a tool to analyze these patterns and prove their worth!  Thanks!! :D
27
Casino Lounge / Re: Gamblers Fallacy as a positive tool
« Last post by Reyth on Yesterday at 04:14:28 PM »
I just want to point out here that the GF is not an objective proveable fact but a theory; statisticians know that it can't actually be proven.  Anytime that someone mentions the GF to you in the form of advice, you should know two things:

1) They are stating their opinion
2) They have some kind of agenda other than just being nice and kind

I will also say here something revolutionary -- this opposition is a GOOD thing!

The reason is because it reminds us of how difficult beating roulette is and it forces us to test our assumptions in order to prove our successes.

To boil it down and filter it for you so that it takes the edge off their attempts to completely mentally and emotionally own you:

Whatever you do in roulette, PROVE THAT IT ACTUALLY WORKS, because odds are, IT DOESN'T!

Apart from that, you are free to ignore the GF and just let these highly motivated staters-of-their-opinion roll just like water off a duck's back! ;)

oh I can feel all the intense appeals to authority coming oh boy I just can't wait!
28
Questions and Answers / Re: My bot/RX.......question/point
« Last post by Reyth on Yesterday at 04:04:01 PM »
Ah, You grizzled felt verterans are so inspiring! (not joking)
29
Roulette Systems / Re: 6 Number System
« Last post by Scarface on Yesterday at 03:13:15 PM »
An alternative to this would be to play the hottest number from each double street...or, play the most recent repeat from each double street.  The idea is to identify the hottest number from each section
30
Questions and Answers / My bot/RX.......question/point
« Last post by mr j on Yesterday at 03:05:45 PM »

So I understand what they both do, I dont need an explanation.

 My concern is, are you not UNprepared when trying to play it on your own at an actual casino?

 Meaning, like the back of your hand, knowing all the "what if" rules, proper chip placements ETC.

 Example.....I email Turbo an idea for a great method and ask him to please test it out for me because I am too lazy and need my hand held like a little kid.

He tests it for a couple weeks and tells me its great, go play it !!

 I go to the CASINO and am LOST in regards to, how to play it. Having a bot/RX (whatever) might speed things way up BUT it takes out the LEARNING (hands on) element of testing.

 Testing at Celtic is slow for you, not me and never will be. If anything, its a bit too fast.

 Dont you want ACTUAL testing to match up with ACTUAL play at an ACTUAL casino?

Ken
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10