Recent Posts

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 10
11
Palestice,  these are nice... pm Real, he may be interested.
12
Roulette Systems / Re: Merge Street
« Last post by TERMINATOR on Today at 03:30:14 AM »
Yes, I also believe progression work and are necessary to overcome the variance.

What (or who) is IDG?
13
I just noticed this topic and I must say I was impressed by the info provided!
Thanks guys
14
Roulette Strategy Discussion / Re: Roulette systems don't work
« Last post by Real on Today at 12:17:48 AM »
My Tally Counter.  You can run several of them at a time if you are tracking the count of different events.Here is a Successive Sequence From HeckTM.  It doesn't look like much until we notice that it extends for over 500 spins and a balance swing of 2500+ units!  I only just barely lost my profit for a brief time and had to go up and down in the recovery levels, locking in my recovery profits, attacking to mitigate previous losses and dealing with false recoveries & repeated dropdowns.  3000 units would more than cover all the fluctuations.At around spin 3000 we can see a full progression loss with raised chips; a 1:101 coups event, which illustrates why having a high-percentage progression win rate is so important.If we look at the sequence from about spin 1500 to around spin 3000 and then compare it to the sequence from around spin 3050 to around spin 3300, it illustrates that progressions DO work; the incline difference is due completely to the progression.This is why surfing skills are so important -- controlling the timing and amount of the progression based on game events as they unfold.  This is what the IDG means when he says, "I sure am good at roulette!" (currently holding a 200,000+ balance, up from 1700 and over an almost 2 year timeframe); he calls it "scrapping" and has faced very many drawdowns, successfully reversing them all.
Reyth,Up as you lose progressions are very inefficient and they don't make sense mathematically.1. You initial bet must be very small so it prevents you from making any real money. Since the initial bet must be so small your unit bet is very small when you hit a lucky streak which in turn limits your win to puny amounts of money2. You have to risk virtually your entire bankroll just for a puny win, which mathematically isn't logical.3. There's no such thing as an up as you lose progression that can win consistently over a long period of time.
15
Roulette Strategy Discussion / Re: Roulette systems don't work
« Last post by Real on Yesterday at 11:48:57 PM »
My Tally Counter.  You can run several of them at a time if you are tracking the count of different events.



Here is a Successive Sequence From HeckTM

It doesn't look like much until we notice that it extends for over 500 spins and a balance swing of 2500+ units! 

I only just barely lost my profit for a brief time and had to go up and down in the recovery levels, locking in my recovery profits, attacking to mitigate previous losses and dealing with false recoveries & repeated dropdowns. 

3000 units would more than cover all the fluctuations.

At around spin 3000 we can see a full progression loss with raised chips; a 1:101 coups event, which illustrates why having a high-percentage progression win rate is so important.

If we look at the sequence from about spin 1500 to around spin 3000 and then compare it to the sequence from around spin 3050 to around spin 3300, it illustrates that progressions DO work; the incline difference is due completely to the progression.

This is why surfing skills are so important -- controlling the timing and amount of the progression based on game events as they unfold. 

This is what the IDG means when he says, "I sure am good at roulette!" (currently holding a 200,000+ balance, up from 1700 and over an almost 2 year timeframe); he calls it "scrapping" and has faced very many drawdowns, successfully reversing them all.

Reyth,

Up as you lose progressions are very inefficient and they don't make sense mathematically.

1. You initial bet must be very small so it prevents you from making any real money. Since the initial bet must be so small your unit bet is very small when you hit a lucky streak which in turn limits your win to puny amounts of money
2. You have to risk virtually your entire bankroll just for a puny win, which mathematically isn't logical.
3. There's no such thing as an up as you lose progression that can win consistently over a long period of time.
16
About this forum / Re: Images
« Last post by kav on Yesterday at 11:14:09 PM »
Yes, the image is fixed.
I use prntscr.com when needed, but with a little hack that points directly to the image. So I'm not sure I can recommend it.
17
About this forum / Re: Images
« Last post by Reyth on Yesterday at 10:58:53 PM »
My Tinypic account is not logging my picture uploads and I am using my Google Pictures function associated with my email address.  I can see the photo fine...

Any suggestions for an image host that is currently functioning and allows 3rd party linking (our forum)?

EDIT: The image in the above post is now fixed!
18
About this forum / Re: Images
« Last post by kav on Yesterday at 10:49:49 PM »
I can view all the images in this page except the last one (googleusercontent.com/4wl...........)
Maybe because its url is too long - my guess is that this is the problem.
19
About this forum / Re: Editing posts
« Last post by kav on Yesterday at 10:47:07 PM »
Maybe you should logout and re-login.
You only see this the button for 1 hour after you posted and only for your last post.
Other members are seeing it, I don't understand why you don't.
20
About this forum / Re: Images
« Last post by TERMINATOR on Yesterday at 10:27:20 PM »
Thanks Reyth.

Any idea why all the "pics" in these posts are X'd out? I'm not able to view any of them. Thanks.
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 10