Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
Casino Lounge / Re: A message for thanks to Charles win3million
« Last post by jerome26b on Yesterday at 09:34:49 PM »

or duncan or whatever,
your last post is smelling 500% scam sorry you don't have the talent of Charles it seems...
last post on me on this thread that became a circus.  I will let the dreamers continue to dream about the hypothetical $ they will earn soon. I just hope nobody sense here will fall in this trap. Oh yes maybe it's the hidden trigger of Charles on his site to trap not the roulette outcome but the money of foolish people.
Enjoy guys ;-)

Roulette Strategy Discussion / Re: Bankroll Management
« Last post by Reyth on Yesterday at 09:22:36 PM »
Ikr?  I love his approach and he is tonnes better at it than I am! :D

Chin Up!
Casino Lounge / Re: Dobbelsteen`Blog
« Last post by Reyth on Yesterday at 09:19:25 PM »
Have you tried testing multiple selections simultaneously?  Like all 3 Dozens at once?  I think we shall notice a difference in one of them in every trial...
Casino Lounge / Re: Dobbelsteen`Blog
« Last post by dobbelsteen on Yesterday at 08:50:38 PM »

 Dobbelsteen theory
I have done and do much research at the random sequences of the roulette. I have developed the short and long run theory. All opponents of roulette will tell you that the results are random, independent and unpredictable. A profit is always luck.
The roulette has an advantage of 2,7% ( one zero roulette) and on the long run everyone will lose. Nobody can tell you what long run means.

My research has learned me that the long run depends on the kind of bet. Basically there are 37 number bets. The 37 number bet has a long run of 0 spins and a one number bet over 1M spins. It is a myth that every wagering kind shall end with a loss of 2,7%.

I have found that every system has a point from where a permanent loss occurs. I have called that point DTOP.
A graph of the occurrence result shows that the result fluctuates. In the beginning the peaks and valley are very high and low. There is a large unbalance of the results. This unbalance has the feature to stabilize. For example this is the case for Red and Black when The ratio R/B is 1. The long run starts.

Where can a player fetch his profit? This is only possible in the first 100 spins. This is a normal play session of a player. A simple system and bank management is enough.
The ECs, the  dozens, the columns and DS are the best table chances. Before starting your bets ,study the history of the last 20 spins and the stats of the last 50 spins. The peaks and valleys are easy recognizable.
The theory of probabilities is very useful for the earlier called chances. The triangle of Blaise Pascal give you fast the probabilities of the ECs. A method of mixed bets is most profitable and spread the risk. The chance, you will fall  in the mouse trap of a variance is very small. Nobody can predict the number of the next spin. Gamblers Fallacy does not exist for a real player.
The knowledge of the short run is the basis for developing a good method. Long run test of systems are very interested and prove,  systems cannot beat the roulette. Your advantage is in the short run.
The number of systems is infinity. There will be always individuals who try to find a Holy Grail. The losers are the fish for the sharks.
The pleasure of playing with the random rows is , why I am a passionate roulette player.
Roulette Strategy Discussion / Re: Bankroll Management
« Last post by scepticus on Yesterday at 08:20:18 PM »

" The wheel has  no memory " is  a Stock Phrase  of mathematicians . Together with the HE these are  the reasons they use to argue  that the HE cannot be beaten (  deep breath ! )  " In the Long Run " .
What I am trying to do is counter their arguments .
But- Yes- the question is " Can we use this Information or is it Useless Information. " ?
Hopefully this is a question McCoy is working on.
Casino Lounge / Re: A message for thanks to Charles win3million
« Last post by Junscissorhands on Yesterday at 06:19:57 PM »
I guess if there is a constant winning method people should work hard for it and not expect to receive it on a silver platter. People have managed to find one (of course up to you again to believe or not) have gone through a tough journey to find it. Charles from win3m has specifically said that only the ones who can crack the code deserve it.

I think Jerome was saying about Duncan's chronological order of saying things weren't right. But if you re-read again he was saying he was working on it the last 8 years, which means he didn't find the complete bet yet just until recent times.

I think Duncan himself should clarify himself but that's how i see it.

Casino Lounge / Re: A message for thanks to Charles win3million
« Last post by Reyth on Yesterday at 06:13:54 PM »
As much as I love the fact that there must be methods to beat the wheel and everything and I see how there is the barest minimum of method data, I can't help but noticing that this appears to be a huge attempt to bait people to communicate privately.

I didn't get this vibe from the Talos posts but I guess some people did. :shrug:

Why are all you guys so secretive?
Casino Lounge / Re: A message for thanks to Charles win3million
« Last post by Junscissorhands on Yesterday at 06:06:39 PM »
Jerome, none have ever claimed that the bet wins EVERY spin. But all in all in should bring your  profit at least 28 out of 30 sessions of 100 spins. Usually it loses once or twice, but not more than 6 times consecutively and IF that happens it's rare and it recovers. But again everybody has the right to remain sceptic, it's normal. People can critise but i think the point has been made, people who have their own ways of winning at roulette should stick with it and there is no need to find something else. There are now 9 pages here, i don't think there is much more else to add up, some people claim the CWB exists, YOU can choose to believe or not, period.


PS: And if people want to believe in Unicorns or Flat Earth then let them be, doesn't hurt right ?
Casino Lounge / Re: A message for thanks to Charles win3million
« Last post by Junscissorhands on Yesterday at 06:00:59 PM »
I completely agree with Esenin he never ever tried to ask for money while he was helping me into finding the bet.I've said this before, that you've never seen a constant winning bet doesn't mean it cannot exist. I was also very sceptical about it but after receiving all the tips and hints from Duncan i've gotten where i am now. You don't know how many e-mails i've bombarded him the last few weeks and he took the time to answer every single one of them.

You see guys, there is nothing to gain here ask anyone here if Duncan asked for money he has not.

But of course it's up to you to believe or not. Pales said people who claim to have an HG usually don't have a dime in their pockets. Most of time i agree, but time around i am a firm believer.

If you don't believe it exists you will not find it.

I don't see any point of people making it up unless they really have mental issues or are narcists.
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10