Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
Roulette Systems / Re: law of the third system
« Last post by Reyth on Today at 02:08:59 AM »
Very kewl Badger!  I am very interested for one! :D
2
Roulette Systems / Re: a VERY nice repeater (hot) method from Ken
« Last post by Reyth on Today at 02:03:50 AM »
Just verifying that if we don't have at least 2 numbers that have shown at least twice in the last 12 spins, it is NO BET, right?

E.G. numbers spun 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1

Here we have the number 1 in our hot list but we don't bet because we only have one number?

And let's say the numbers spun are 1 2 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1

Here we bet 1 and 2, spin once and get the number 11.  Now we remove the number 1 from the hot list, which leaves only the number 2 and therefore NO BET, right?
3
Casino Lounge / Re: Spin history as a tool.
« Last post by MrPerfect. on Today at 12:37:11 AM »
How to estimate black /red if ball jump more then 1 number?
4
Roulette Systems / Re: a VERY nice repeater (hot) method from Ken
« Last post by mr j on Yesterday at 10:39:05 PM »
A couple more examples. Lets all be on the same page. >>

You are betting 12 36
a 36 hits. Your list should look like >> 12 36

You are betting 3 8 28 20
a 3 hits. Your list should look like >> 28 20 3.
Very next spin is another 3. Your list should look like >> 20 3 (never go under two numbers bet)

You are betting 21 33 6 20 15. You have just started your 8 count(?)
You go 8 spins, no win, no other number added on.
Your list should look like >> 20 15.

You are betting 21 33 6 20 15. You have just started your 8 count(?)
Three spins into it, a 9 has two hits on your 12 number(?) history board.
Your list should look like >> 33 6 20 15 9.....AND....IMPORTANT.....your 8 count starts over fresh!!

Ken
5
Gambling Philosophy / Re: RDL - Red Days of Loss
« Last post by scepticus on Yesterday at 09:47:13 PM »
I thought Mr. Perfect was being charitable !. Admittedly , I don't indulge in drugs - or over- indulge in alcohol.
6
Gambling Philosophy / Re: RDL - Red Days of Loss
« Last post by MickyP on Yesterday at 09:36:56 PM »
I do enjoy "natural" thought provoking reasoning of the unexplainable.

We all have Red Days of Loss. Whether it is the universe or lady luck on her day off, we have to agree the phenomenon exists. I think recognising and dealing with such days is a better option than ignoring it because of our own limits to understanding such phenomenon.

Having said that, we can not predict or presume the arrival or length in time of continuous losing streaks against a winning method of play. It may be a few hours, exactly four days or a few weeks. The best is to play the ace hidden up your sleeve, reduce your bets and hope the storm passes quickly.

A good read Thomasleor, thanks.

7
Casino Lounge / Re: Spin history as a tool.
« Last post by scepticus on Yesterday at 09:35:30 PM »
Mr.Perfect
An estimate IS just an educated guess - and this is what Method Players do. Well, MOST method players.
8
Roulette Systems / Re: a VERY nice repeater (hot) method from Ken
« Last post by iar000 on Yesterday at 08:40:23 PM »
I just tried this on a real live roulette table. It's actually a very good method and I more than doubled my money in 20 minutes. I'm gonna investigate this further.

Thanks, J :-)

Hi Rourke.....

Please let us know about yours tests
Thanks
9
Roulette Systems / Re: a VERY nice repeater (hot) method from Ken
« Last post by Rourke on Yesterday at 08:31:45 PM »
I just tried this on a real live roulette table. It's actually a very good method and I more than doubled my money in 20 minutes. I'm gonna investigate this further.

Thanks, J :-)
10
Casino Lounge / Re: Optimum amount of numbers to play.
« Last post by MickyP on Yesterday at 08:21:15 PM »
Visual ballistics seems to dominate the answers to the question and it all swings to few numbers are better to play. However, system players should consider the question when selecting a system/strategy to play.

As I stated in my opening post, playing many numbers should give you more wins but a loss will rob you of several wins. When you loose playing many numbers you are compelled to chase losses to win. It's a very unstable way to play. Many experienced players advise against chasing losses. A progression on many numbers is a bankroll killer.

On the other hand playing a few numbers will not always produce frequent wins but if your stake is let's say 5 times smaller than the payout you have opportunity for a win without play adjustments to chase losses. This is a big advantage to playing less numbers.

Different methods require different betting requirements and you should consider the "payoff" of risk vs reward in the amount of numbers at play.
 
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10