Author Topic: Gambler's Fallacy Mega thread  (Read 1184 times)

MrPerfect.

  • Veteran Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 546
  • Thanked: 335 times
Re: Gambler's Fallacy Mega thread
« Reply #30 on: December 30, 2016, 11:05:00 PM »
They are not even it is 14 and there is 4, but thats I think will happen often i a short run as this. First if it is keeping up over more, it may be some evidence.
obviosly they are not evenly distrebuted. It's a bias wheel.
 So wich numbers would you pick up as your bet and for wich denominations?
  No need to freak out, it's an exercise,  not real play. Just make a choice and post it.
 

Reyth

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3030
  • Thanked: 818 times
Re: Gambler's Fallacy Mega thread
« Reply #31 on: December 30, 2016, 11:26:41 PM »
My favorite numbers are:

2 6 13 23 33

10 7 3 36 31 24 20

I will start off betting all of these numbers SU 1 unit.
 

MrPerfect.

  • Veteran Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 546
  • Thanked: 335 times
Re: Gambler's Fallacy Mega thread
« Reply #32 on: December 31, 2016, 12:33:24 AM »
 guys, this is little hint for your consideration. On the column "edge" is shown percentage of return on investment that numbers produced during these 300 spins.
 @Reyth, probably you would reconsider to remove obviosly negative numbers from your selection? There is still time.
 

Reyth

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3030
  • Thanked: 818 times
Re: Gambler's Fallacy Mega thread
« Reply #33 on: December 31, 2016, 12:36:59 AM »
I put them there deliberately. ;)

I'm not afraid of red lines with minus signs :P

I normally don't play "100 spins without being able to touch anything" but regardless I put my selection together with some intentional deliberation (but not too much). :D
« Last Edit: December 31, 2016, 12:39:43 AM by Reyth »
 

MrPerfect.

  • Veteran Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 546
  • Thanked: 335 times
Re: Gambler's Fallacy Mega thread
« Reply #34 on: December 31, 2016, 01:33:11 AM »
I put them there deliberately. ;)

I'm not afraid of red lines with minus signs :P

I normally don't play "100 spins without being able to touch anything" but regardless I put my selection together with some intentional deliberation (but not too much). :D
I have to admit,  some of whatever numbers you prefered actually surprise!!! WENT HIGHLY POSITIVE. Unfortunately,  others....
Despite the result, l like your way of thinking... 
 

Reyth

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3030
  • Thanked: 818 times
Re: Gambler's Fallacy Mega thread
« Reply #35 on: December 31, 2016, 02:37:42 AM »
Hee hee we have hijacked this comfy home. :D
 

MrPerfect.

  • Veteran Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 546
  • Thanked: 335 times
Re: Gambler's Fallacy Mega thread
« Reply #36 on: December 31, 2016, 04:22:36 PM »
Hee hee we have hijacked this comfy home. :D
I hate to admit it, but looks like you are only one with courage to select numbers to bet.
  As they say, who doesn't bet , doesnt win. So , Reyth, YOU ARE THE WINNER OF THIS TASK. Congratulations.
 Later lll post other numbers and superficial explanation of what l would select and why.
 
The following users thanked this post: Reyth

Bayes

  • Veteran Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 579
  • Thanked: 438 times
  • roulettician.com
Re: Gambler's Fallacy Mega thread
« Reply #37 on: December 31, 2016, 05:31:06 PM »
It's not that I don't have the courage, but I was going to try a system which involves a lot of computation and I haven't had time to write the program today. So could you hold off posting the remaining numbers for a couple more days?

In the meantime, here is my simplistic selection of numbers to bet on: 2, 5, 13, 23, 28, 33
 
The following users thanked this post: Reyth

MrPerfect.

  • Veteran Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 546
  • Thanked: 335 times
Re: Gambler's Fallacy Mega thread
« Reply #38 on: December 31, 2016, 11:31:09 PM »
It's not that I don't have the courage, but I was going to try a system which involves a lot of computation and I haven't had time to write the program today. So could you hold off posting the remaining numbers for a couple more days?

In the meantime, here is my simplistic selection of numbers to bet on: 2, 5, 13, 23, 28, 33
Take your time.
 

Real

  • Fighting the war on absurdity one foolish idea at a time.
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1203
  • Thanked: 120 times
  • Gender: Female
Re: Gambler's Fallacy Mega thread
« Reply #39 on: January 30, 2017, 05:27:54 PM »
Duncan,

A fool and his money are soon parted.

Like it or not, there is no possible way to hedge a negative expectation game.  It's beyond absurd.


 

Reyth

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3030
  • Thanked: 818 times
Re: Gambler's Fallacy Mega thread
« Reply #40 on: January 30, 2017, 06:17:20 PM »


Beware the Batman!

« Last Edit: January 30, 2017, 06:24:34 PM by Reyth »
 

Jesper

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1138
  • Thanked: 537 times
  • Gender: Male
Re: Gambler's Fallacy Mega thread
« Reply #41 on: January 30, 2017, 06:24:06 PM »
If we bet all we got on black after 13 reds, and win. Would it be valid?   How many system which not calls for rapid progression out of the players capacity and bankroll relay harm.

You can and many are rich without any clue why.  The Lady luck do not care how you play.
 

Real

  • Fighting the war on absurdity one foolish idea at a time.
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1203
  • Thanked: 120 times
  • Gender: Female
Re: ROULETTE CAN BE BEATEN! PROOF!!!
« Reply #42 on: February 10, 2017, 01:51:54 AM »
My posts have the potential to save you loads of cash, and decades of wasted time and effort away from family and friends.

Furthermore, I've explained where to look and how beat the wheel, as well as which resources to utilize.


« Last Edit: February 10, 2017, 01:53:47 AM by Real »
 
The following users thanked this post: mr j, jerome26b

Real

  • Fighting the war on absurdity one foolish idea at a time.
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1203
  • Thanked: 120 times
  • Gender: Female
Re: The 'SSB' (Shoe Shine Boy) Method
« Reply #43 on: March 23, 2017, 04:51:07 PM »
You can't hedge in a negative expectation game and turn it into a positive one.

Betting on the zero is pointless.
 
The following users thanked this post: jekhb76

Reyth

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3030
  • Thanked: 818 times
Re: Gambler's Fallacy Mega thread
« Reply #44 on: March 23, 2017, 07:07:50 PM »


Sorry we didn't get it the 100 times before that you said the same thing.
 
The following users thanked this post: ShadowBlue