Author Topic: Very Strange Method!!  (Read 2428 times)

leontin

  • New
  • **
  • Posts: 5
  • Thanked: 4 times
Re: Very Strange Method!!
« Reply #30 on: April 03, 2017, 03:17:35 PM »
A system similar to this from her , to obtain a number to play around with was to decompose last three numbers spun and add them. For example last three numbers spun are 12, 28, 32.
So 12 is 1+2= 3
      28 is 2+8=10 which is 1+0= 1
      32 is 3+2=5

So 3+1+5= 9

So the number to play around with is 9.
 
The following users thanked this post: jekhb76

funtomas76

  • New
  • **
  • Posts: 64
  • Thanked: 69 times
Re: Very Strange Method!!
« Reply #31 on: April 03, 2017, 04:26:28 PM »
Years ago I played this .... but not very often ...   

actual Last number = number from where to count
number before actual number = if odd count clockwise, if even count anti-clockwise
number before = numers to count

If you have 15 - 29 - 10  count on the wheel from 10 clockwise 15 numbers. So you have to bet 12 red (with neighbours).

Crazy , but funny.
 
The following users thanked this post: Reyth, jekhb76

dobbelsteen

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1266
  • Thanked: 307 times
Re: Very Strange Method!!
« Reply #32 on: April 03, 2017, 07:38:04 PM »
such system are very nice for players ,who play  at the first for funA flat bet on one number can be very dull. Beter is , such as funtomas suggest to bet the neighbors of that number. You can abroad this with columns or dozens and even wth ECs. A stratistic player can do it also with a strategy
 
The following users thanked this post: Reyth, funtomas76, jekhb76

jekhb76

  • Mature Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 278
  • Thanked: 329 times
  • Gender: Male
Re: Very Strange Method!!
« Reply #33 on: April 04, 2017, 05:03:37 AM »
thanks for the advice. did you mean the neighbors om the wheel or the table layout?
thanks.
 

dobbelsteen

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1266
  • Thanked: 307 times
Re: Very Strange Method!!
« Reply #34 on: April 04, 2017, 09:19:53 AM »
I meant the neighbors on the wheel. It is not custom to call neighbors for the table layout. You have to wait for the Dutch table layout. On the Dutch Table  the numbers on the table are also the neighbors on the wheel.
 
The following users thanked this post: jekhb76

Freewheel

  • New
  • **
  • Posts: 3
Re: Very Strange Method!!
« Reply #35 on: June 05, 2017, 08:31:20 PM »
It’s very rare but I have known lines sleep for over 80 spins. I prefer a gentle progression.
It’s  very likely already been thought of and it may not be as profitable, as increasing your bet after 5 losses but most of the time, it is a lot easier on the bank-roll. I feel protecting that is a priority.

I use your method, to choose my line and keep betting one unit, until I get a win. If I break even or profit, I start again, otherwise I cross off 5 losses and increase my stake to 2 units until I get another win. I cross off 5 losses after each win. If there are still some uncrossed 1 unit losses, I stay with 2 units and so on.

This morning's session, was probably my worse but after playing 232 bets, I
still won 67 units.

Here is an example, from this morning’s session
L1
L1L1W5  + 2 start againL1L1L1L1L1L1L1L1L1L1L1L1L1W5  -8 Strike through 5 losses. Increase stake to 2 units.L2L2L2L2L2W10  -8 Strike through 5 losses 1 unit losses still left, stay with 2 unitsL2L2L2L2L2W10  -8 Strike through 5 losses, increase to 3 unitsL3L3L3L3L3L3L3L3L3L3L3L3W15 -29 Strike through 5 losses, 2 unit losses still left. Stay with 3 units.L3L3L3L3L3L3L3L3L3L3W15  -44 Strike through 5 losses, increase stake to 4 units.W20 -24 Strike through 5 losse  3 unit losses still left. Stay with 4 unitsL4L4L4L4L4L4L4L4L4L4L4L4L4L4L4L4W20  -68 Strikethrough 5 losses, still 3 unit losses left. Stay with 4 unitsL4L4L4L4L4L4L4L4    -100 biggest drawdownW20 -80 Strikethrough 5 losses,, still 3 unit losses left. Stay with 4 unitsW20 -60 Strikethrough 5 losses. Increase stake to 5 units.L5L5L5W25 -45.Strikethrough 5 losses, still 4 unit losses left. Stay with 5 units.L5L5L5L5L5L5L5L5L5W25 -65. Strikethrough 5 losses, still 4 unit losses left. Stay with 5 units.L5L5L5L5L5L5W25 -70. Strike through 5 losses, still 4 unit losses left. Stay with 5 unitsW25 -45  Strike through 5 losses,  still 4 unit losses left.  Stay with 5 unitsL5L5W25 -30 Strike through 5 losses. Increase to 6 unitsL6L6L6L6L6W30 -30 Strike through 5 losses, 5 unit losses left. Stay with 5 unitsL6W30 --6 Strike through 5 losses. I personally, would not want to risk a long run of losses at 6 units a pop, for the sake of a 6 unit drawdown but that’s just me. I have reduced the stakes to 3 units.L3W15 +12113 bets, 96 losses, 17 wins.Like I said earlier, this was my worse session yet, certainly not typical. After all that, I only made 6 units but I survived the losing run from Hell and came out ahead.
« Last Edit: June 05, 2017, 08:43:34 PM by kav »
 

Freewheel

  • New
  • **
  • Posts: 3
Re: Very Strange Method!!
« Reply #36 on: June 05, 2017, 08:36:47 PM »
Hoe embarrassin. I don't know what happened to my example I will try and sort it out
 

Freewheel

  • New
  • **
  • Posts: 3
Re: Very Strange Method!!
« Reply #37 on: June 05, 2017, 08:58:12 PM »


It’s very rare but I have known lines sleep for over 80 spins. I prefer a gentle progression.

It’s  very likely already been thought of and it may not be as profitable, as increasing your bet after 5 losses but most of the time is a lot easier on the bank-roll. I feel protecting that is a priority.

I use your method, to choose my line and keep betting one unit, until I get a win. If I break even or profit, I start again, otherwise I cross off 5 losses and increase my stake to 2 units until I get another win. I cross off 5 losses after each win. If there are still some uncrossed 1 unit losses, I stay with 2 units and so on.

This mornings session, was probably my worse but after playing 232 bets, I

still won 67 units.

Here is an example, from this morning’s session

L1

L1

L1

W5  + 2 start again

L1

L1

L1

L1

L1

L1

L1

L1

L1

L1

L1

L1

L1

W5  -8 Strike through 5 losses. Increase stake to 2 units.

L2

L2

L2

L2

L2

W10  -8 Strike through 5 losses 1 unit losses still left, stay with 2 units

L2

L2

L2

L2

L2

W10  -8 Strike through 5 losses, increase to 3 units

L3

L3

L3

L3

L3

L3

L3

L3

L3

L3

L3

L3

W15 -29 Strike through 5 losses, 2 unit losses still left. Stay with 3 units.

L3

L3

L3

L3

L3

L3

L3

L3

L3

L3

W15  -44 Strike through 5 losses, increase stake to 4 units.

W20 -24 Strike through 5 losse  3 unit losses still left. Stay with 4 units

L4

L4

L4

L4

L4

L4

L4

L4

L4

L4

L4

L4

L4

L4

L4

L4

W20  -68 Strikethrough 5 losses, still 3 unit losses left. Stay with 4 units

L4

L4

L4

L4

L4

L4

L4

L4    -100 biggest drawdown

W20 -80 Strikethrough 5 losses,, still 3 unit losses left. Stay with 4 units

W20 -60 Strikethrough 5 losses. Increase stake to 5 units.

L5

L5

L5

W25 -45.Strikethrough 5 losses, still 4 unit losses left. Stay with 5 units.

L5

L5

L5

L5

L5

L5

L5

L5

L5

W25 -65. Strikethrough 5 losses, still 4 unit losses left. Stay with 5 units.

L5

L5

L5

L5

L5

L5

W25 -70. Strike through 5 losses, still 4 unit losses left. Stay with 5 units

W25 -45  Strike through 5 losses,  still 4 unit losses left.  Stay with 5 units

L5

L5

W25 -30 Strike through 5 losses. Increase to 6 units

L6

L6

L6

L6

L6

W30 -30 Strike through 5 losses, 5 unit losses left. Stay with 5 units

L6

W30 --6 Strike through 5 losses. I personally, would not want to risk a long run of losses at 6 units a pop, for the sake of a 6 unit drawdown but that’s just me. I have reduced the stakes to 3 units.

L3

W15 +12

113 bets, 96 losses, 17 wins.

Like I said earlier, this was my worse session yet, certainly not typical. After all that, I only made 6 units but I survived the losing run from Hell and came out ahead.