Royal Panda roulette

Author Topic: PATTERN BREAKER  (Read 517 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

The Bedsit Botter

  • New
  • **
  • Posts: 95
  • Thanked: 47 times
  • Gender: Male
PATTERN BREAKER
« on: January 31, 2018, 10:52:06 AM »
There does not seem to be any mention on this forum of what is perhaps the GREATEST Roulette system ever devised on the Internet.

The original forum where this method was posted ran to 109 pages when I last looked in.  This is unprecedented and it would be worthy of some discussion here.

All credit for the original idea should go to John Legend.

**PATTERN BREAKER**

How it came to be. People have been trying to design systems to overcome house edge, beat a game with no memory and defy mathematicians since this game came to be.

WHILE thousands of systems need random to deliver something within a certain number of spins to succeed. PATTERN BREAKER asks RANDOM to do something its not very good at people. DELIVER THE LAST PATTERN OF A THREE SPIN COMBINATION IMMEDIATELY AFTER ITS DELIVERED THE SECOND TO LAST.

The original rules have been improved and I have listed them here:

Track the numbers as they are spun in groups of 3 spins at a time.  (If zero shows whilst tracking ignore it)

Each group of 3 spins will be a combination of either ODD EVEN RED BLACK HIGH OR LOW

The full list is here:

HHH   RRR   OOO
LLL   BBB   EEE
HLH   RBR   OEO
LHL   BRB   EOE
HHL   RRB   OOE
LLH   BBR   EEO
HLL   RBB   OEE
LHH   BRR   EOO

Each time a pattern of 3 appears cross it out on the list until there is only one pattern left in either the Red/Black or High/Low or Odd/Even list.

When there is only one pattern left you immediately start betting against it using a 1-2-4 martingale.

This is the main difference to the original method in so much as we let the wheel choose our bet.

On average you should have a bet selection after 40 spins of tracking.

If you lose a game you will have lost 7 units.  People regularly report winning streaks of well over ten games without a loss so the occasional 7 unit loss should not hurt too much as every won game makes you 1 unit of profit.

The aim should be to play one game a day only and to play with a big stake to make it worthwhile such as £50 requiring a bankroll of £350. Of course to do this you would need a life time bankroll of around £3000 in case you were unlucky enough to lose a few games early on.

Questions, testing or general observations welcomed.
 
Please don't bother to post saying all systems lose and that nothing can overcome the house advantage as we have already heard this at least 1000 times before and this is the SYSTEMS section.  Thanks.
« Last Edit: January 31, 2018, 10:55:24 AM by The Bedsit Botter »


 
The following users thanked this post: kav, MREKO, SugTips

Mike

  • Veteran Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 795
  • Thanked: 117 times
Re: PATTERN BREAKER
« Reply #1 on: January 31, 2018, 11:26:19 AM »
Please don't bother to post saying all systems lose and that nothing can overcome the house advantage as we have already heard this at least 1000 times before and this is the SYSTEMS section.  Thanks.

Ok, I won't. But for a realistic picture of how this system performs you should read the original thread in full. Google "pattern breaker john legend".  ;)
 

Jesper

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1426
  • Thanked: 738 times
  • Gender: Male
Re: PATTERN BREAKER
« Reply #2 on: January 31, 2018, 11:39:48 AM »
It is all a joke, read the treads about it all over all old fora.  Johnny Legend and some more name he used (Sentiel) , and perhaps now The Bedsit Botter,  who had the unbeatable system, need to borrow or they gave him some money, to proof it at a 1 cent casino, some gave him a password to an account with some money.  It took some time before the system bust, and that was because there is so many empty spins, the bets are very few. It is a typical method relay on spin history.  The report was often 2 units won after hundreds of spins, and a few bets. It went bust, before any but few units plus.

It can of course with luck go long time and win some. Myself has just gone 1703 sessions won with methods which I am sure can bust any time, but not yet.

As I have stated before, a long tread is not a sign of quality.
 
The following users thanked this post: MREKO

Trilobite

  • Mature Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 370
  • Thanked: 142 times
Re: PATTERN BREAKER
« Reply #3 on: January 31, 2018, 11:45:14 AM »
I remember bayes challenged john legend to prove his method, and another member named skakus joined the challenge.

john legend got owned by the challenge and the challenge got owned by skakus.

 :o
 

Mike

  • Veteran Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 795
  • Thanked: 117 times
Re: PATTERN BREAKER
« Reply #4 on: January 31, 2018, 11:46:56 AM »
That's right Jesper, and JL also accepted another challenge, playing his dozens system. It failed of course, and eventually he just disappeared. He was a master at self-promotion though and the threads were very entertaining.
 

The Bedsit Botter

  • New
  • **
  • Posts: 95
  • Thanked: 47 times
  • Gender: Male
Re: PATTERN BREAKER
« Reply #5 on: January 31, 2018, 11:58:38 AM »
I have read the entire thread all 109 pages of it!

Are people saying SENTINEL3 is John Legend?

Of course I am not John Legend I really hope you don't think that's the case? I live in the UK for a start and I'm pretty sure John was an American.

The reason I bring it up here is that there was no mention of it anywhere on this forum and personally I think it's an interesting method.

The original method was based on High/Low only where as the new improved rules allow for any E/C to be used. Which one depends on the wheel.

Anyone can easily test this method for themselves on paper and see that it does work.  Of course any 3 step martingale will work most of the time.

The interesting question is does on average it work more than 7 times in a row without busting using the new improved rules?

Easy for someone who can code stuff to test this I would imagine.
« Last Edit: January 31, 2018, 12:00:57 PM by The Bedsit Botter »
 

Jesper

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1426
  • Thanked: 738 times
  • Gender: Male
Re: PATTERN BREAKER
« Reply #6 on: January 31, 2018, 12:23:52 PM »
Johnny Legend is from UK. It is no doubt, from the old posts.
 

The Bedsit Botter

  • New
  • **
  • Posts: 95
  • Thanked: 47 times
  • Gender: Male
Re: PATTERN BREAKER
« Reply #7 on: January 31, 2018, 12:28:56 PM »
OK if that's what you think I won't post here anymore.

Is it OK with you if I continue to login and read other peoples posts from time to time?
 

Jesper

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1426
  • Thanked: 738 times
  • Gender: Male
Re: PATTERN BREAKER
« Reply #8 on: January 31, 2018, 12:47:42 PM »
Of course you can post, I am not who decide who posts.
 

MREKO

  • New
  • **
  • Posts: 91
  • Thanked: 37 times
Re: PATTERN BREAKER
« Reply #9 on: January 31, 2018, 01:45:43 PM »
Guys, he just posted a roulette system to roulette forum to a topic of roulette systems.

Thanks for the share anyway, but someone told the true, i dont know who becasuse I must use Reply, not Quote, that the weakness of the system is that we must wait around 150-200 spin to bet two times. This is nonsense, expecialy then, when we lost the 2 bet too. What is the trigger, where is the system? I read the post, I know we bet when stay only one triple even trigger, but what is the evidence, that this triple even bet is better than any other simple martingale bet on high or low or other? So if we get in row the triple triggers , and the final stand stays only one, why would be bet on them, why should come this final trigger ? I think that is as same as streets because streets have 3 numbers. But when we wait until 5 street shows up from 6 , and then we bet on the suxth 3 times , it is not good system. Sure it is not completely the same, just in big size, maybe doesnt matter.
 

kav

  • www.Roulette30.com
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2086
  • Thanked: 1077 times
  • Gender: Male
Re: PATTERN BREAKER
« Reply #10 on: January 31, 2018, 04:23:54 PM »
Bedsit,
Interesting approach. I'm not familiar with it.
 

scepticus

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2401
  • Thanked: 521 times
Re: PATTERN BREAKER
« Reply #11 on: January 31, 2018, 06:03:41 PM »
At least Mister Eko has treated the initial post with respect for  Bedsit.
 

The Bedsit Botter

  • New
  • **
  • Posts: 95
  • Thanked: 47 times
  • Gender: Male
Re: PATTERN BREAKER
« Reply #12 on: January 31, 2018, 06:47:54 PM »
Yes, although he mentions one must wait 150-200 spins before placing a bet.  This is not correct the average waiting time is around 40 spins using the method as posted here.

Also "we" don't place two bets "we" place three bets unless of course one of the first two bets win which ends the session.

A lot of people don't agree with the Hit and Run concept but for those that do, this is designed to be played Hit and Run style. Ideally just one game per day.

If we want to take this concept even further we could also apply the ideas given in the book Astrology - The Key To Roulette published in 1908 which advises to never play on a Sunday and to only play during the period of Sunrise wherever you happen to be in the world.
 
« Last Edit: January 31, 2018, 07:20:35 PM by The Bedsit Botter »
 

thelaw

  • New
  • **
  • Posts: 51
  • Thanked: 12 times
Re: PATTERN BREAKER
« Reply #13 on: January 31, 2018, 06:48:33 PM »
Pattern Breaker was designed by the notorious troll John Legend who's expressed purpose was to con other members into believing his systems were legit, and then drop his infamous "John Legend strikes again" after they started to fail.

Anyone posting his methods here without the above information for context is either:
a. Trolling for attention
b. Ignorant of JL's actual posts (they haven't actually read them)

Based on the purposeful hyperbolic presentation of the OP here, I would guess the former to be more likely.
 

The Bedsit Botter

  • New
  • **
  • Posts: 95
  • Thanked: 47 times
  • Gender: Male
Re: PATTERN BREAKER
« Reply #14 on: January 31, 2018, 06:57:29 PM »
I stated in my first post it was devised by John Legend