### Author Topic: Progressions vs flat betting  (Read 449 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

#### MrPerfect.

• Hero Member
• Posts: 1459
• Thanked: 837 times
##### Progressions vs flat betting
« on: April 08, 2017, 01:04:59 PM »
It's difficult to play when you do not know what is normal. Instead of trying to beat mathematically perfect game, focus on device itself. It will resolve 50% of your problems straight away.
Why choose predetermined dousen for example? You could always compose your own dousen with numbers that have positive expectations.  Then thing of loss/ win monitoring  will have a meaning as well.
Why look meaningless things in hopeless situation? If you are not in control of your investment - it's gambling. And do not come up with " control of expences" , this idea is flowed. Gambling is strictly loosing proposition,  game itself is mathematecally riged egainst you. It's arithmetics , Bro.

#### MrPerfect.

• Hero Member
• Posts: 1459
• Thanked: 837 times
##### Re: Progressions vs flat betting
« Reply #1 on: April 08, 2017, 07:48:58 PM »
Good result would be if you bet any other numbers, even if no progression is used.

#### MrPerfect.

• Hero Member
• Posts: 1459
• Thanked: 837 times
##### Re: Progressions vs flat betting
« Reply #2 on: April 08, 2017, 11:23:34 PM »
Qweak qwestionary...
Who besides me see that flat betting on all other numbers would make 200 units? It's more then 2200% money of that wonderful progression result that you guys even bother to discuss.
If not blind , post yes!!!
I do not mean trolling. I just never seen people seriously considering possibility to play with 30% negative edge. I really hope that at least anyone here stop for a second and think about it.
You guys have to understand that to play systems need to have a random game. Not random game simply mean that there is more variance. In this case in particular, it's enough to produce heart attack! !!!
If not anything, just learn simple arithmetics. If casinos see anyone to play this way , they gonna offer you room, drinks, transportation, breakfast, lanch and dinner for free. You will become fat ...

#### MrPerfect.

• Hero Member
• Posts: 1459
• Thanked: 837 times
##### Re: Progressions vs flat betting
« Reply #3 on: April 09, 2017, 12:03:31 AM »
Progressions shouldn't be used to make money!!!
They are tools to amplify your win, not the tools to achieve it.... it's simply a dead end. 300 years people try, 300 years casinos prosper. 300 years of misery for punters.... They call it entertainment. ...........................

• Mature Member
• Posts: 230
• Thanked: 305 times
##### Re: Progressions vs flat betting
« Reply #4 on: April 09, 2017, 12:54:29 AM »

Mr perfect,

I think you are trying to said something helpfull in terms of comparing progressions as oppose to playing flat bet. I know that if a system is of any value it will or should win by flat betting. that is true. I think players use progressions in order to make their time worth while and get in profit,or losses faster. no progression is what makes you money. it is just a mean to gain a outcome quicker in a short term. but also the risk is greater.
if you can explain further your ideas in simpler statements and examples I think it would be helpfull for many of us. I know many players dont use flat betting because of the lack of anderstanding of it.
maybe discuss the pros and cons would be easier in comparing the two ?
best,

#### Bayes

• Veteran Member
• Posts: 688
• Thanked: 562 times
• roulettician.com
##### Re: Progressions vs flat betting
« Reply #5 on: April 09, 2017, 07:25:30 AM »
One patological looser chooses worst bet possible, other congratulate him on good progression. Are you guys out of your mind?
This is your REALITY. This is what you guys face day after day.

Nice!

Mr P, FYI, the sequence I posted doesn't represent a real set of spins I actually played. The point is to compare the performance of various progressions under adverse circumstances, that's all. It may seem pointless to you, but some of us enjoy experimenting and running "what-if" scenarios.  And you never really answered my question. The REALITY is that runs from hell do occur, even for an AP. It's no good burying your head in the sand and pretending that you can side-step probability by waiting for virtual wins. How you choose to deal with the RFH is another matter. Using progressions is an option; if you think they're too risky, don't use them. Your choice.

#### MrPerfect.

• Hero Member
• Posts: 1459
• Thanked: 837 times
##### Re: Progressions vs flat betting
« Reply #6 on: April 09, 2017, 11:40:47 AM »
Bayes, l apologise for misunderstanding of this tread... l red it superficially.  However l really hope you got my point!!!
Even the fact that you simulate such a situation  show evidence that you do not know when it's possible to win. Progressions are tools and should not be taken lightly! !! Each different case require different type of progression and case you posted require bets with value zero!!!! Instead of progressing anything player, if he really a player SHOULD RUN!!!
There are times you should play and there are times you should hold. Without clear understanding of these times , be it by statistical or physics/ statistical methods , you can not win!!!!
People loose money on the damn thing and most frequent culpit of this is people themselves! !!! Stupid decisions lead to stupid results.
Remember, HIT AND RUN SHOULD BE BASED ON YOUR PERFORMANCE AND ABILITY TO PLAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! If you get it right , you will win. If not, even l can not help you.
Fighting wheel or dealer or casino or person operating rrs or clown who has control of the ball...  it's all pointless,  with all my knolidge lm able to get zero game in this situations. How many people have my level of knolidge or can have a zero game in difficult situations?
Remember, when posting , you affect opinions of inocent new fellows who will read it..... protect them from both, your mistakes and casino malice. ...