Author Topic: Martingrail FINAL  (Read 344 times)

scepticus

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1666
  • Thanked: 307 times
Re: Martingrail FINAL
« Reply #15 on: March 16, 2017, 11:59:32 PM »
Aren't  you implying that the single number WILL win more often than the two other numbers combined ?
 

BlueAngel

  • I always express my opinion
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1435
  • Thanked: 195 times
  • Gender: Male
  • Do you want truth? You cannot handle the truth!
Re: Martingrail FINAL
« Reply #16 on: March 17, 2017, 12:03:03 AM »

Not any single VS any 2 singles, but the top against the 2 bottom.
« Last Edit: March 17, 2017, 12:14:17 AM by kav »
 

scepticus

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1666
  • Thanked: 307 times
Re: Martingrail FINAL
« Reply #17 on: March 17, 2017, 12:05:26 AM »

???
Explain please .
 

BlueAngel

  • I always express my opinion
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1435
  • Thanked: 195 times
  • Gender: Male
  • Do you want truth? You cannot handle the truth!
Re: Martingrail FINAL
« Reply #18 on: March 17, 2017, 12:13:06 AM »
What exactly you don't get?

The fact that the top number in appearances will always eclipse the hits of the two longest sleepers??
Don't you know that 2 numbers could be absent for more than 4,5, or even more cycles??
Don't you know that the top performing number could generate from 8 up to 15 hits during those cycles?

Get it?
« Last Edit: March 17, 2017, 12:14:01 AM by kav »
 

scepticus

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1666
  • Thanked: 307 times
Re: Martingrail FINAL
« Reply #19 on: March 17, 2017, 01:10:27 AM »

It depends BA, on WHEN your top number repeats and WHEN the two sleepers awake. You are indulging in maths theory - not in reality. I can profit when betting sleepers - not a single number but a group of numbers.
Like me, you base your bets on an assumption, but, unlike you , I don't assume that it is bulletproof.
Anyway, I think we have hijacked this thread for too long so I'll end this discussion here .
 

BlueAngel

  • I always express my opinion
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1435
  • Thanked: 195 times
  • Gender: Male
  • Do you want truth? You cannot handle the truth!
Re: Martingrail FINAL
« Reply #20 on: March 17, 2017, 01:37:31 AM »

It depends BA, on WHEN your top number repeats and WHEN the two sleepers awake. You are indulging in maths theory - not in reality. I can profit when betting sleepers - not a single number but a group of numbers.
Like me, you base your bets on an assumption, but, unlike you , I don't assume that it is bulletproof.
Anyway, I think we have hijacked this thread for too long so I'll end this discussion here .

Speak for yourself Scepticus because I never use guesses and assumptions like you do, I'd rather use rock solid facts such as:

A number always does 1 hit before 2, 2 before 3, 3 before 4, 4 before 5...and so on.
2 to 4 numbers will always sleep more than 111 spins (3 cycles)
More than 1 numbers may be under the same category but as the game progress those options are becoming fewer and fewer.
Therefore the only question is more numbers for less time or less numbers for more time??

If you analyze these facts you'd conclude that you can't lose not even a single session if you'd make proper decisions.
 
The following users thanked this post: Reyth, MrPerfect.

MrPerfect.

  • Veteran Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 538
  • Thanked: 323 times
Re: Martingrail FINAL
« Reply #21 on: March 23, 2017, 08:32:15 AM »
Interesting. ...
   This kind of math l find atractive.  Especially when numbers in qwestion are positive in their overall expectation.  In fact this is what l work on closely at the moment. Did you do some deep studies ? If yes, ld like to see results.