You are a hard man to convince Mr P that some of us win more than we lose .
No. I don’t have to give you the maths to justify my method, Like some others in the forum I don’t think we should divulge how we arrive at our conclusions. I have stated that I use The Nine Block- The 5 in 7 and the New 3 Sets of 12 so go figure. Unless, of course, you are too LAZY to do so.
As for the maths, I have said that I ignore the zero and calculate an “Even Steven “ bet - a bet that has an even chance of success going by the maths. Add an idea and there you have it.. Didn’t Bayes criticise me for ignoring the zero? I think the zero has the same chance as any other number so ignore it because to win some number/s must be left out mustn’t they ? So why not the zero ?Has it some magical property that other numbers don‘t have ?
You forget that I offered to come to your local casino and show me betting in a real life situation . You declined yet NOW ask for proof ! What better proof than an actual demonstration ?
As for my being a critic you are the one who told Reyth
"No need to devise method based on stats themselves. Stats is just a tool to assess physical underlying reasons ( deffects, limits in freedom of system "
You are fixated with AP and , basically, tell others that they are wasting their time using a method other than AP. And THAT is not “ criticising ?
Finding a biased wheel means that you have identified a section of the wheel that is favoured. This means that no more work is necessary . You merely keep betting that particular section. So it is you that is wasting your time , not us. Well , not yet anyway !
l was not criticising Reyth post. It was a really good one. I have written there exactly what l mean to say. I already spent several months thinking about it, however.... it's like sniping. You need to know how far is the " target". Judging probabilities of hit on next spin makes sense only if some limits have been established. If it's random, relying on next spin more highly then on previous is pointless. You need these extra hits that advantage produce in order to exploit such approach. And you do need to know where they are more likely to manifest and why.
Math or stats doesn't cut it by itself, these are simply tools , not solutions. Imagine that final result is to hang your coat on the wall. You got hammer ( math), you got ability ( stats), but no neil ( physics) to finish the job. That's all about it. You need all 3 to be suxsessful.
No need to convince me of anything. You not play for my money, but for yours.
I have no clue whatsoever what is it about betting number just because it's green . I would consider to bet it if it show ratio better then 1:36 or would be in high probability zone....
I really don't know why would you need a personal demo from me. You can see same thing doing simulation in your local casino. Just chart ball jumps and diamond hits. If there is a pattern, l could exploit it. I do not see reason to hide what lm doing. It's have been shown many times by different people on YouTube for example. It's not a secret long ago, just some technical stuff is omitted, rest of it is common knolidge.
System players clame too much sometimes, but rarely have something to show. Don't get me wrong, some do show actually, Sputnik for example. It's amazing to see that some are able to manage logically sound method that is well presented. I would more likely to consider his method for a test then something l have problems to connect with.