Scepticus, we do not avoid variance, we include it in our play model.
Play with or without computer is compulsory. You can use one stop watch and one metronome to achieve same results in prediction as l do. They can be mecanical devices. If you wish, you can use pen and paper to your data analysis. .. it's time consuming but posible. [size=78%]As you probably know by now, my roulette computer don't predict, it informes and make simple arithmetic calculations. So it can easyly be replaced by additional team player.
Do not confuse prediction and forcast. Prediction is on the current spin, forecast is on some spins further . Forecast is rather about conditions in the game then actually numbers themselves. It's done with the help of physics and statistics combined. It's much more accurate then weather forcast , for example....
Superiority of the method is not an issue here. You can think whatever you wish. System player play with fixed odds, AP disrupt odds ( if he is good, in his favor).
You probably will be curios to know, some AP treat variables as unknowns as well. I have a friend in Argentina, he play bias old style. .. lots of numbers gathered, ignoring variables.. ets. It just makes his work more difficult, but don't change the fact his being AP.
I have a proposition for system players in general, not only you. Let's combine our efforts. Use of any betting system becomes more easy when you have odds disrupted on your favor. As an example you could see charts l posted on other tread ( where to bet)... situation there can be compared to black/ red thing. Imagine what would happen if you could limit half of wheel from hitting 60- 90 % of the time... life becomes more easy, doesn't it? Still there is a question how to limit this half of wheel as you go and not post factum. ... and how to explore it best way possibe. Why system players not focus on that instead? It would be common benefit. Just to make you think a bit..... l have a method of betting wich is more powerful then Kelly creteria on a short run ( up to 2k spins), so things like that do have their place , can be devised and explored, why not focus on it?[/size]