Poll

What do you think

Good
9 (100%)
Bad
0 (0%)

Total Members Voted: 9

Author Topic: NEW SYSTEM- FEW NUMBERS  (Read 1184 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

palestis

  • Veteran Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 642
  • Thanked: 454 times
Re: NEW SYSTEM- FEW NUMBERS
« Reply #15 on: November 08, 2017, 10:31:08 PM »
Of course. All tests on the systems I work with are using live roulette numbers.
 

iar000

  • New
  • **
  • Posts: 27
  • Thanked: 7 times
Re: NEW SYSTEM- FEW NUMBERS
« Reply #16 on: November 08, 2017, 10:35:44 PM »
Ok and is it good in long term too...

You said minimum BR $200 ... is it correct 

tell me more

thanks
« Last Edit: November 11, 2017, 02:10:57 AM by kav »
 

palestis

  • Veteran Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 642
  • Thanked: 454 times
Re: NEW SYSTEM- FEW NUMBERS
« Reply #17 on: November 08, 2017, 10:47:40 PM »
If a system is only good for the short term, then it's not a good system.
As far as B/R I don't know about $200. Maybe it's more than enough with $1 chips, but not for $10 chips. 200 units is more pertinent.
The only problem with this system is the fact that it requires very accurate record keeping while at play. Because each number that you play has unique starting and ending betting points, and you have to keep track of each number separately. The more numbers you play the more complicated record keeping the system requires. But whenever at a profit, you cancel everything and start from the beginning with one number.
 
The following users thanked this post: december, Reyth

iar000

  • New
  • **
  • Posts: 27
  • Thanked: 7 times
Re: NEW SYSTEM- FEW NUMBERS
« Reply #18 on: November 10, 2017, 12:31:36 PM »
palestis

how long is a session ..... give me average when you play this system
« Last Edit: November 11, 2017, 02:10:36 AM by kav »
 

palestis

  • Veteran Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 642
  • Thanked: 454 times
Re: NEW SYSTEM- FEW NUMBERS
« Reply #19 on: November 11, 2017, 01:33:57 AM »
It depends on the chip value you are using and how much you want to make. If you are using $1 chips and aim at $500, you obviously have to spend a lot of hours in the session.
But for an average win of about $200 and using $5 chips, you can make that in about 1-2 hours.
 
The following users thanked this post: Reyth

Fyodor

  • New
  • **
  • Posts: 15
  • Thanked: 14 times
Re: NEW SYSTEM- FEW NUMBERS
« Reply #20 on: Yesterday at 11:06:41 PM »
How do you "pick" your original random numbers, to begin with, are they generated by an existing algorithm, or created some other way?

 
The following users thanked this post: Reyth

Reyth

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3825
  • Thanked: 1206 times
Re: NEW SYSTEM- FEW NUMBERS
« Reply #21 on: Yesterday at 11:08:32 PM »
I herd a rumour that Pales has an RNG in his hed!  :o
 

Fyodor

  • New
  • **
  • Posts: 15
  • Thanked: 14 times
Re: NEW SYSTEM- FEW NUMBERS
« Reply #22 on: Yesterday at 11:37:36 PM »
The trouble with thinking of a random number, is that it is a contradiction in terms, and cannot be done.
And what happens if the "random" number I just thought of is 753? Do I reduce it, add the elements, add the first two figures and divide the result by the third, add the end figures and divide the middle, those two options give me 4 and 2 as results, so should I consider 21 (between them on the wheel) as being the first random number?
 How many times do I have to wrack my brain?
Here's an easier method.
This is a string of absolutely random numbers within the scope of roulette.
23, 34, 25, 27, 31, 5, 23, 10, 19, 8, 28, 8 and 15.
From the only relevant RNG, the wheel itself.
 

Reyth

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3825
  • Thanked: 1206 times
Re: NEW SYSTEM- FEW NUMBERS
« Reply #23 on: Yesterday at 11:48:22 PM »
I see your point.  Since our betting method will eventually start using the wheel generated numbers, it would make sense to use the wheel to start with.

I wouldn't be surprised to hear that Pales preselects the numbers deliberately though...

And its a great question to ask, does he table hop or stay at the same table, like Harry?
 

Fyodor

  • New
  • **
  • Posts: 15
  • Thanked: 14 times
Re: NEW SYSTEM- FEW NUMBERS
« Reply #24 on: Today at 12:29:49 AM »
A realization just invaded my personal space.
-Quite logical really, the  Marquee provides, as a subset, individual "hot" and "cold" numbers.
In purely numeric terms, the computer does not  attribute those numbers to the relevant zones or sectors of the wheel, e.g.; it obviously does not 'know that 15 is next to 32 (or 19) or that "orphelins" is a (wheel divided) pattern bet, as I have often seen 13 (or whatever number) indicated as "hot" while showing 27 (or whatever adjacent number as "cold".
Would not a "tropical zone" "temperate zone" and "arctic zone" be more sensible?
To my mind, the most recent results are in the tropics, and most likely to stay there.
So, looking for clusters of "ripe fruit" at the top of the Marquee "tree" is my preference.

 
The following users thanked this post: Reyth