Janusz, sry asking, but did you read a doc l posted? Autors choice of numbers has nothing to do with Marcov or distances between numbers... it's simply due the fact that these numbers pass 3% filter.

There is no errors in autors math besides logical ones. I have no clue whatsoever about first half of document, where he makes unnecessary math show off. There was no need to prove that probability of each number to hit is 1/37, he could simply say so, l would belive him , wouldn't you?

Since when stats math is not transferable to roulette?